Padilla et al v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al

Filing 113

ORDER re: parties' 111 Stipulated Motion Regarding Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Forthcoming Motion to Vacate. April 26, 2019: Deadline for Defendants' Motion to Vacate; May 10, 2019: Deadline for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Vacate; May 15, 2019: Deadline for Defendants' reply in support of their Motion to Vacate. Compliance with the Preliminary Injunction 110 entered on April 5, 2019, is hereby STAYED until May 31, 2019. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00928-MJP Document 113 Filed 04/23/19 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE YOLANY PADILLA, IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES, BALTAZAR VASQUEZ, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (“ICE”); U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (“DHS”); U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (“CBP”); U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (“USCIS”); EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW (“EOIR”); THOMAS HOMAN, Acting Director of ICE; KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of DHS; KEVIN K. McALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of CBP; L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Director of USCIS; MARC J. MOORE, Seattle Field Office Director, ICE, WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General; LOWELL CLARK, warden of the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington; CHARLES INGRAM, warden of the Federal Detention Center in SeaTac, Washington; DAVID SHINN, warden of the Federal Correctional Institute in Victorville, California; JAMES JANECKA, warden of the Adelanto Detention Facility; 17 No. 2:18-cv-928 MJP JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ FORTHCOMING MOTION TO VACATE NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: APRIL 22, 2018. Defendants-Respondents. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g), Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate and jointly move the Court for an Order setting forth the below briefing schedule for Defendants’ forthcoming motion to vacate the preliminary injunction, and also jointly move the Court for an Order staying the enforcement of the preliminary injunction until May 31, 2019. Defendants will be moving to vacate this Court’s April 5, 2019, preliminary injunction in light of the Attorney General’s decision in Matter of M-S-, 27 I&N Dec. 509 (A.G. 2019), which overruled Matter of X-K-, 23 I&N Dec. 731 (BIA 2005). In order to resolve the impact of this 26 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ FORTHCOMING MOTION TO VACATE CASE NO. 2:18-cv-928 MJP U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation, District Court Section PO Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Telephone (202) 616-4458 Case 2:18-cv-00928-MJP Document 113 Filed 04/23/19 Page 2 of 5 1 decision on the preliminary injunction as expeditiously as possible, the parties have met and 2 conferred and agreed upon the following briefing schedule. 3 April 26, 2019: Deadline for Defendants’ Motion to Vacate 4 May 10, 2019: Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Vacate 5 May 15, 2019: Deadline for Defendants’ reply in support of their Motion to Vacate 6 Given the complex issues that the parties anticipate briefing, the parties also stipulate to a 7 page limit of 24 pages for Defendants’ Motion and Plaintiffs’ Opposition, and 12 pages for 8 Defendants’ reply. 9 The parties also stipulate to a stay of the enforcement of the preliminary injunction until 10 May 31, 2019, in order to resolve the impact of Matter of M-S- before the injunction goes into 11 effect. To that effect, the parties respectfully request that this Court rule on the Motion to Vacate 12 on or by May 31, 2019.1 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Defendants reserve the right to move for an emergency stay if the Court has not ruled on the Motion to Vacate. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ FORTHCOMING MOTION TO VACATE CASE NO. 2:18-cv-928 MJP U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation, District Court Section PO Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Telephone (202) 616-4458 Case 2:18-cv-00928-MJP Document 113 Filed 04/23/19 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this April 19, 2019. s/ Matt Adams Matt Adams, WSBA No. 28287 Email: matt@nwirp.org 4 5 6 7 Leila Kang, WSBA No. 48048 Email: leila@nwirp.org Aaron Korthuis, WSBA No. 53974 Email: aaron@nwirp.org 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT 615 Second Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone: (206) 957-8611 Facsimile: (206) 587-4025 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Petitioners JOSEPH. H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General Civil Division WILLIAM C. PEACHEY Director, District Court Section Office of Immigration Litigation 17 18 EREZ REUVENI Assistant Director, District Court Section 19 Trina Realmuto* Kristin Macleod-Ball* AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL 1318 Beacon Street, Suite 18 Brookline, MA 02446 (857) 305-3600 trealmuto@immcouncil.org kmacleod-ball@immcouncil.org *Admitted pro hac vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Petitioners /s/ Lauren C. Bingham LAUREN C. BINGHAM, Fl. Bar #105745 Trial Attorney, District Court Section Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 (202) 616-4458; (202) 305-7000 (fax) lauren.c.bingham@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants-Respondents 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ FORTHCOMING MOTION TO VACATE CASE NO. 2:18-cv-928 MJP U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation, District Court Section PO Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Telephone (202) 616-4458 Case 2:18-cv-00928-MJP Document 113 Filed 04/23/19 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 ORDER Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. The following deadlines govern Defendants’ forthcoming Motion to Vacate: 4 April 26, 2019: Deadline for Defendants’ Motion to Vacate 5 May 10, 2019: Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Vacate 6 May 15, 2019: Deadline for Defendants’ reply in support of their Motion to Vacate 7 Compliance with the Preliminary Injunction entered on April 5, 2019, is hereby STAYED 8 until May 31, 2019. 9 10 11 DATED this 23rd day of ____April_____________, 2019. A 12 13 Marsha J. Pechman United States Senior District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ FORTHCOMING MOTION TO VACATE CASE NO. 2:18-cv-928 MJP U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation, District Court Section PO Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Telephone (202) 616-4458 Case 2:18-cv-00928-MJP Document 113 Filed 04/23/19 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 23, 2019, I had the foregoing electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to those attorneys of record registered on the CM/ECF system. All other parties (if any) shall be served in 5 6 accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 7 /s/ Lauren C. Bingham LAUREN C. BINGHAM, Fl. Bar #105745 Trial Attorney, District Court Section Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 (202) 616-4458; (202) 305-7000 (fax) lauren.c.bingham@usdoj.gov 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorney for Defendants 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ FORTHCOMING MOTION TO VACATE CASE NO. 2:18-cv-928 MJP U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation, District Court Section PO Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Telephone (202) 616-4458

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?