State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al

Filing 103

ORDER denying Interested Party Benjamin Barber's #99 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (Benjamin Barber terminated.) (cc: Benjamin Barber via USPS)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-01115-RSL Document 103 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al., NO. C18-1115RSL ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 This matter comes before the Court on Benjamin Barber’s request for leave to file an amicus brief on behalf of the “Nerd Party.” “District courts frequently welcome amicus briefs from non-parties concerning legal issues that have potential ramifications beyond the parties 19 directly involved or if the amicus has unique information or perspective that can help the court 20 beyond the help that the lawyers for the parties are able to provide.” NGV Gaming, Ltd. v. 21 Upstream Point Molate, LLC, 355 F. Supp.2d 1061, 1067 (N.D. Cal. 2005) (internal quotation 22 23 24 25 26 marks and citations omitted). In the circumstances presented here, however, the Court declines to consider Mr. Barber’s amicus brief. The motions for preliminary relief have been fully resolved, and there is no indication that Mr. Barber has unique information or perspective that could not have been presented by defense counsel if they thought it helpful. 27 28 ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF - 1 Case 2:18-cv-01115-RSL Document 103 Filed 09/19/18 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 For all of the foregoing reasons, the request for leave to file an amicus brief (Dkt. # 99) is DENIED. Dated this 18th day of September, 2018. 4 A 5 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?