State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
ORDER denying plaintiff State of Oregon's #57 Motion for Relief from Pro Hac Vice Requirements. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
Case 2:18-cv-01115-RSL Document 65 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM PRO HAC VICE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
STATE, et al.,
This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff State of Oregon’s Motion for Relief
from Pro Hac Vice Requirements.” Dkt. # 57. The motion is DENIED. As is the norm in this
district, counsel who are not admitted to practice before the Court must submit an application to
participate in this case pro hac vice and must be represented by local counsel. See State of
Washington v. Trump, C17-0141JLR. Because Senior Assistant Attorney General Scott J.
Kaplan is a member of the Washington State Bar Association, he need not submit a pro hac vice
application. He may not, however, act as local counsel for purposes of LCR 83.1(d).
Dated this 16th day of August, 2018.
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM PRO HAC VICE REQUIREMENTS - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?