Employee Painters Trust et al v. Seattle Professional Auto Glass LLC et al
Filing
2
ORDER RENOTING 1 MOTION for Judgment by Confession : Noting Date 5/4/2018, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (CDA)cc defendants per order/ sent via US Mail and email
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
_______________________________________
)
EMPLOYEE PAINTERS’ TRUST, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
SEATTLE PROFESSIONAL AUTO GLASS )
LLC and TERRY WAYNE SANKEY,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)
No. MC18-0044RSL
ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
14
15
On April 9, 2018, plaintiffs filed a “Motion for Entry of Judgment by Confession.” Dkt.
16
# 1. There is no indication that defendants were served with the motion and no justification for
17
its ex parte consideration. The fact that the parties agreed that judgment by confession could be
18
sought with no further notice to defendants (Dkt. # 1-2 at ¶ 15(a)) does not bind the Court.
19
Because the relief sought will obviously impact defendants, defendants will be given an
20
opportunity to respond notwithstanding their prior agreement to an ex parte determination of the
21
matter.
22
Because plaintiffs seek dispositive relief, the Clerk of Court is directed to note the
23
“Motion for Entry of Judgment by Confession” on the Court’s calendar for Friday, May 4, 2018.
24
A copy of the motion (Dkt. # 1) and this Order shall be sent to defendants at the following street
25
and email addresses:
26
ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
1
2
3
4
Seattle Professional Auto
Glass, LLC
10560 Aurora Ave. N
Seattle, WA 98133
Terry Wayne Sankey
10560 Aurora Ave. N
Seattle, WA 98133
Terry Wayne Sankey at
terry@professionalglass.com
5
6
7
Dated this 12th day of April, 2018.
8
A
9
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?