Employee Painters Trust et al v. Seattle Professional Auto Glass LLC et al

Filing 2

ORDER RENOTING 1 MOTION for Judgment by Confession : Noting Date 5/4/2018, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (CDA)cc defendants per order/ sent via US Mail and email

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 _______________________________________ ) EMPLOYEE PAINTERS’ TRUST, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) SEATTLE PROFESSIONAL AUTO GLASS ) LLC and TERRY WAYNE SANKEY, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) No. MC18-0044RSL ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 14 15 On April 9, 2018, plaintiffs filed a “Motion for Entry of Judgment by Confession.” Dkt. 16 # 1. There is no indication that defendants were served with the motion and no justification for 17 its ex parte consideration. The fact that the parties agreed that judgment by confession could be 18 sought with no further notice to defendants (Dkt. # 1-2 at ¶ 15(a)) does not bind the Court. 19 Because the relief sought will obviously impact defendants, defendants will be given an 20 opportunity to respond notwithstanding their prior agreement to an ex parte determination of the 21 matter. 22 Because plaintiffs seek dispositive relief, the Clerk of Court is directed to note the 23 “Motion for Entry of Judgment by Confession” on the Court’s calendar for Friday, May 4, 2018. 24 A copy of the motion (Dkt. # 1) and this Order shall be sent to defendants at the following street 25 and email addresses: 26 ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 Seattle Professional Auto Glass, LLC 10560 Aurora Ave. N Seattle, WA 98133 Terry Wayne Sankey 10560 Aurora Ave. N Seattle, WA 98133 Terry Wayne Sankey at terry@professionalglass.com 5 6 7 Dated this 12th day of April, 2018. 8 A 9 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?