United States of Amercia v. Stewart et al
Filing
11
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHMENT ORDER signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik re 9 Motion (CDA)
1
The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
JOHN MALCOLM STEWART,
(2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1)
Agreed Continuing Garnishment
Order
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
15
and
16
17
NO. 2:18-MC-00099-RSL
VOLUME SERVICES, INC.,
Garnishee.
18
19
20
A Writ of Continuing Garnishment directed to Garnishee, Volume
21
Services, Inc., has been duly issued and served upon the Garnishee. Pursuant
22
23
24
to the Writ, Garnishee Volume Services, Inc. filed its Answer on November 16,
2018, stating that at the time of the service of the Writ, Defendant/Judgment
25
Debtor John Malcolm Stewart (Mr. Stewart) was an active employee who was
26
paid bi-weekly.
27
//
28
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHMENT ORDER
(USA v. John Malcolm Stewart and Volume Services, Inc.,
USDC#: 2:18-MC-009992-RSL / 2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1) - 1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
1
After notification of the garnishment proceeding was mailed to the parties
2
on or about October 12, 2018, the Defendant/Judgment Debtor has not
3
4
5
requested a hearing to determine exempt property as of this date. On February
19, 2019, the United States filed an Agreed Motion to Issue Continuing
6
Garnishment Order, stating that it had agreed with Mr. Stewart, through his
7
counsel, to request a reduced garnishment rate of 15 percent of his disposable
8
earnings at Volume Services, Inc.
9
10
11
The United States attached a Proposed
Agreed Continuing Garnishment Order to that effect, jointly presented with Mr.
Stewart for signature.
12
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:
13
That Garnishee, Volume Services, Inc., shall pay to the United States
14
District Court for the Western District of Washington, all non-exempt earnings
15
16
17
payable to Mr. Stewart, that it has previously withheld pursuant to the Writ of
Garnishment;
18
That from this date forward, Volume Services, Inc. shall withhold and pay
19
to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, 15
20
percent of the disposable earnings payable to Mr. Stewart upon each period of
21
22
23
time when Mr. Stewart is entitled to receive such funds, and shall continue
such payments, if any, until Mr. Stewart’s debt is paid in full or until he is no
24
longer an active employee of Garnishee and the Garnishee no longer has
25
possession, custody, or control of any funds due and owing to Mr. Stewart, or
26
until further order of this Court;
27
28
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHMENT ORDER
(USA v. John Malcolm Stewart and Volume Services, Inc.,
USDC#: 2:18-MC-009992-RSL / 2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1) - 2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
1
That such payments shall be applied to Mr. Stewart’s outstanding
2
obligation by the United States District Court for the Western District of
3
4
Washington; and
That the payments shall be made out to the United States District Court,
5
6
Western District of Washington, referencing Case Nos. 2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1
7
and 2:18-MC-00090-RSL, and delivered either personally or by First Class Mail
8
to:
9
10
11
United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Attn: Financial Clerk – Lobby Level
700 Stewart Street
Seattle, Washington 98101.
12
13
DATED this 20th day of February, 2019.
14
15
16
17
A
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Court Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHMENT ORDER
(USA v. John Malcolm Stewart and Volume Services, Inc.,
USDC#: 2:18-MC-009992-RSL / 2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1) - 3
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?