United States of Amercia v. Stewart et al

Filing 11

AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHMENT ORDER signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik re 9 Motion (CDA)

Download PDF
1 The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. JOHN MALCOLM STEWART, (2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1) Agreed Continuing Garnishment Order Defendant/Judgment Debtor, 15 and 16 17 NO. 2:18-MC-00099-RSL VOLUME SERVICES, INC., Garnishee. 18 19 20 A Writ of Continuing Garnishment directed to Garnishee, Volume 21 Services, Inc., has been duly issued and served upon the Garnishee. Pursuant 22 23 24 to the Writ, Garnishee Volume Services, Inc. filed its Answer on November 16, 2018, stating that at the time of the service of the Writ, Defendant/Judgment 25 Debtor John Malcolm Stewart (Mr. Stewart) was an active employee who was 26 paid bi-weekly. 27 // 28 AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHMENT ORDER (USA v. John Malcolm Stewart and Volume Services, Inc., USDC#: 2:18-MC-009992-RSL / 2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1) - 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970 1 After notification of the garnishment proceeding was mailed to the parties 2 on or about October 12, 2018, the Defendant/Judgment Debtor has not 3 4 5 requested a hearing to determine exempt property as of this date. On February 19, 2019, the United States filed an Agreed Motion to Issue Continuing 6 Garnishment Order, stating that it had agreed with Mr. Stewart, through his 7 counsel, to request a reduced garnishment rate of 15 percent of his disposable 8 earnings at Volume Services, Inc. 9 10 11 The United States attached a Proposed Agreed Continuing Garnishment Order to that effect, jointly presented with Mr. Stewart for signature. 12 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: 13 That Garnishee, Volume Services, Inc., shall pay to the United States 14 District Court for the Western District of Washington, all non-exempt earnings 15 16 17 payable to Mr. Stewart, that it has previously withheld pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment; 18 That from this date forward, Volume Services, Inc. shall withhold and pay 19 to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, 15 20 percent of the disposable earnings payable to Mr. Stewart upon each period of 21 22 23 time when Mr. Stewart is entitled to receive such funds, and shall continue such payments, if any, until Mr. Stewart’s debt is paid in full or until he is no 24 longer an active employee of Garnishee and the Garnishee no longer has 25 possession, custody, or control of any funds due and owing to Mr. Stewart, or 26 until further order of this Court; 27 28 AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHMENT ORDER (USA v. John Malcolm Stewart and Volume Services, Inc., USDC#: 2:18-MC-009992-RSL / 2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1) - 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970 1 That such payments shall be applied to Mr. Stewart’s outstanding 2 obligation by the United States District Court for the Western District of 3 4 Washington; and That the payments shall be made out to the United States District Court, 5 6 Western District of Washington, referencing Case Nos. 2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1 7 and 2:18-MC-00090-RSL, and delivered either personally or by First Class Mail 8 to: 9 10 11 United States District Court, Western District of Washington Attn: Financial Clerk – Lobby Level 700 Stewart Street Seattle, Washington 98101. 12 13 DATED this 20th day of February, 2019. 14 15 16 17 A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHMENT ORDER (USA v. John Malcolm Stewart and Volume Services, Inc., USDC#: 2:18-MC-009992-RSL / 2:07-CR-00302-RSM-1) - 3 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?