Balan v. Tesla Motors Inc
Filing
101
ORDER re-noting Plaintiff's 83 MOTION to Vacate Arbitration Award. Plaintiff's motion to vacate is re-noted for consideration on 4/8/2022. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SB)
Case 2:19-cv-00067-MJP Document 101 Filed 04/27/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
CRISTINA BALAN,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
CASE NO. C19-67 MJP
v.
ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION TO
VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD
TESLA MOTORS INC.,
Defendant.
15
16
17
This matter is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the arbitration
18
award was noted for consideration on April 1, 2022. (Dkt. No. 83.) However, in its motion to
19
dismiss Plaintiff’s motion, Defendant challenges the Court’s jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 87.) That
20
motion is noted for April 8. Because the Court must address jurisdiction as a predicate issue,
21
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 94–95 (1998), Plaintiff’s motion to vacate is
22
re-noted for consideration on April 8.
23
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to Plaintiff and all counsel.
24
ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD - 1
Case 2:19-cv-00067-MJP Document 101 Filed 04/27/22 Page 2 of 2
1
Dated April 27, 2022.
2
A
3
Marsha J. Pechman
United States Senior District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?