Balan v. Tesla Motors Inc

Filing 101

ORDER re-noting Plaintiff's 83 MOTION to Vacate Arbitration Award. Plaintiff's motion to vacate is re-noted for consideration on 4/8/2022. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SB)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-00067-MJP Document 101 Filed 04/27/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 CRISTINA BALAN, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. C19-67 MJP v. ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD TESLA MOTORS INC., Defendant. 15 16 17 This matter is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the arbitration 18 award was noted for consideration on April 1, 2022. (Dkt. No. 83.) However, in its motion to 19 dismiss Plaintiff’s motion, Defendant challenges the Court’s jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 87.) That 20 motion is noted for April 8. Because the Court must address jurisdiction as a predicate issue, 21 Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 94–95 (1998), Plaintiff’s motion to vacate is 22 re-noted for consideration on April 8. 23 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to Plaintiff and all counsel. 24 ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD - 1 Case 2:19-cv-00067-MJP Document 101 Filed 04/27/22 Page 2 of 2 1 Dated April 27, 2022. 2 A 3 Marsha J. Pechman United States Senior District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?