Hunichen v. Atonomi LLC et al

Filing 237

ORDER re Parties' #236 Stipulation and Proposed Order To Extend Deadlines to file Objections and Responses. The parties shall have a seven-day extension to file objections to the 11/12/2021 Magistrate Judge's #233 Report and Recommendation Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification and the 11/12/2021 Magistrate Judge's #234 Report and Recommendation Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Partial Class-Wide Settlement. The new deadline to file objections is 12/3/2021. The parties shall also have a seven-day extension to file responses to any objections filed. The new deadline to file responses to objections is 12/17/2021. Signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (SR)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-00615-RAJ-SKV Document 237 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 5 1 THE HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 (On Reference to the Honorable S. Kate Vaughan) 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CHRIS HUNICHEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. ATONOMI LLC, a Delaware LLC, CENTRI TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, LAUNCHCAPITAL, LLC, a Delaware LLC, M37 VENTURES, INC., a Nevada Corporation, VAUGHAN EMERY, an individual, DAVID FRAGALE, an individual, ROB STRICKLAND, an individual, DON DELOACH, an individual, WAYNE WISEHART, an individual, WOODY BENSON, an individual, MICHAEL MACKEY, an individual, and JAMES SALTER, an individual, 18 19 Defendants. Atonomi LLC, a Delaware LLC, 20 21 22 Counterclaimant, vs. CHRIS HUNICHEN, an individual, 23 24 25 26 27 28 Counter-Defendant. Atonomi LLC, a Delaware LLC, Third Party Plaintiff, vs. DAVID PATRICK PETERS, an individual, SEAN GETZWILLER, an individual, DAVID CUTLER, an individual, and STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORTS No. 19-2-cv-00615-RAJ-MAT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C19-0615-RAJ-MAT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF 233] REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF 234] REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S PARTIAL SETTLEMENT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI 101 W. Broadway, Ste 2000, San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 696-6700 Case 2:19-cv-00615-RAJ-SKV Document 237 Filed 11/18/21 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CHANCE KORNUTH, an individual, ) DENNIS SAMUEL BLIEDEN, an individual, ) ) Counter-Defendants. ) ) ) Plaintiff Chris Hunichen (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants ATONOMI LLC (“Atonomi”), CENTRI TECHNOLOGY, INC. (“CENTRI”), M37 VENTURES, INC. (“M37”), VAUGHAN EMERY, ROB STRICKLAND, DON DELOACH, WAYNE WISEHART, MICHAEL MACKEY, and JAMES SALTER, (collectively “Defendants”) stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the current deadline to file objections to the November 12, 2021 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF 233] Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification and the November 12, 2021 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF 234] Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Partial Class-Wide Settlement (collectively, the “Reports”) is November 26, 2021. WHEREAS, the current deadline to file responses to any objections to the Reports is December 10, 2021. WHEREAS, due to the Thanksgiving Holiday and previously scheduled vacations, the parties met and conferred, and agree to a seven-day extension to file objections to the Reports and a seven-day extension to file responses to the objections to the Reports. WHEREAS, the new deadline to file objections to the Reports is December 3, 2021. WHEREAS, the new deadline to file responses to objections to the Reports is December 17, 2021. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: The parties shall have a seven-day extension to file objections to the November 12, 2021 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification and the November 12, 2021 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Partial Class-Wide Settlement. The new deadline to file objections is December 3, 2021. The parties shall also have a seven-day extension to file responses to any objections filed. The new deadline to file responses is STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORTS No. 19-2-cv-00615-RAJ-MAT GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI 101 W. Broadway, Ste 2000, San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 696-6700 Case 2:19-cv-00615-RAJ-SKV Document 237 Filed 11/18/21 Page 3 of 5 1 December 17, 2021. 2 3 SO STIPULATED. 4 5 Dated: November 17, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 6 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP 7 By: /s/ David W. Silke David W. Silke, WSBA No. 23761 Miles Scully (CA SBN: 135853), Admitted Pro Hac Vice William Rathbone (CA SBN: 95864), Admitted Pro Hac Vice Yuo-Fong Chang Amato (CA SBN: 261453), Admitted Pro Hac Vice 101 West Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 696-6700 wrathbone@grsm.com 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Defendants Atonomi LLC, a Delaware LLC, CENTRI Technology, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Rob Strickland, Don Deloach, Wayne Wisehart, Michael Mackey, and James Salter HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP By: /s/ J. Matthew Donohue J. Matthew Donohue, WSB #52455 Matt.Donohue@hklaw.com Shannon Armstrong, WSB #45947 Shannon.Armstrong@hklaw.com Kristin Asai, WSB #49511 Kristin.Asai@hklaw.com 601 SW Second Avenue, Suite 1800 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: 503.243.2300 Fax: 503.241.8014 Attorneys for Defendant M37 Ventures Inc. LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP By: /s/ Kathleen A. Nelson Kathleen A. Nelson, WSB #22826 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: 206.876.2965 Fax: 206.436.2030 Attorney for Defendant Vaughan Emery STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORTS No. 19-2-cv-00615-RAJ-MAT GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI 101 W. Broadway, Ste 2000, San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 696-6700 Case 2:19-cv-00615-RAJ-SKV Document 237 Filed 11/18/21 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ARD LAW GROUP PLLC By: _/s/ Joel B. Ard Joel B. Ard, WSBA # 40104 Ard Law Group PLLC P.O. Box 11633 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 206.701.9243 Joel@Ard.law Attorneys for Plaintiffs AFN Law PLLC By: _/s/ Angus F. Ni Angus F. Ni, WSBA # 53828 AFN Law PLLC 506 2nd Ave, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98104 646.543.7294 Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE RESTIS LAW FIRM, P.C. William R. Restis (admitted pro hac vice) 402 West Broadway, Suite 1520 San Diego, CA 92101 619.270.8383 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORTS No. 19-2-cv-00615-RAJ-MAT GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI 101 W. Broadway, Ste 2000, San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 696-6700 Case 2:19-cv-00615-RAJ-SKV Document 237 Filed 11/18/21 Page 5 of 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Based on the foregoing Stipulation: 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall have a seven-day extension to file 4 objections to the November 12, 2021 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 5 Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification and the November 12, 2021 Magistrate 6 Judge’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of 7 Partial Class-Wide Settlement. The new deadline to file objections is December 3, 2021. The 8 parties shall also have a seven-day extension to file responses to any objections filed. The new 9 deadline to file responses to objections is December 17, 2021. 10 SO ORDERED. 11 DATED this 18th day of November, 2021. 12 A 13 S. KATE VAUGHAN United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORTS No. 19-2-cv-00615-RAJ-MAT GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI 101 W. Broadway, Ste 2000, San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 696-6700

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?