Quinteros v. InnoGames et al
Filing
103
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 101 Motion for Scheduling Order. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint consistent with the Ninth Circuit's rulings. If Plaintiff fail to do so, this case will be closed. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
PENNY QUINTEROS,
CASE NO. C19-1402RSM
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
12
INNOGAMES, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
SCHEDULING ORDER
Defendants.
13
14
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Penny Quinteros’s Motion for
15 Scheduling Order. Dkt. #101. On January 8, 2024, the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and
16 reversed and remanded in part this Court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
17 Dkt. #100. The Ninth Circuit ruled that “the district court properly found Quinteros failed to
18 state a claim as to all the claims raised in the complaint.” Id. at 3. However, for some claims,
19 the Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal on different grounds. Id. The Ninth Circuit concluded that
20 this Court abused it discretion in denying Plaintiff leave to amend, reversed and remanded so
21 that she could be “given more than one opportunity to cure the deficiencies in her pleading.” Id.
22 at 11. The Mandate was issued on January 30, 2024. Dkt. #102.
23 //
24
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER - 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff now asks the Court to “enter a scheduling order identifying the date when the
amended complaint should be filed by.” Dkt. #101. Defendants have not filed a response brief
or otherwise communicated with the Court. Given all of the above and the remainder of the
record, the Court FINDS and ORDERS that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date
of this Order to file an amended complaint consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s rulings. If
Plaintiff fail to do so, this case will be closed.
DATED this 6th day of February, 2024.
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?