Taylor v. Harbaugh et al

Filing 55

ORDER. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 50 ) is GRANTED in part and Defendant Harvey Harbaugh is DISMISSED. The remainder of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Defendants' Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 51 ) is GRANTED in part and Plaintiff's request for economic damages will not be presented to the jury. The remainder of Defendants' Supplemental Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 AMY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 CASE NO. C19-1761 MJP v. HARVEY HARBAUGH, et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Defendant. 14 15 16 This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 50) 17 and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 51). Having read the Response (Dkt. No. 53) 18 and the related record and for the reasons stated on the record (Dkt. No. 54) the Court GRANTS 19 the Motions in part and DENIES the Motions in part as follows: 20 (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 50) is GRANTED in part and Defendant 21 Harvey Harbaugh is DISMISSED. The remainder of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 22 is DENIED; 23 24 ORDER GRANTING IN PART DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - 1 1 (2) Defendants’ Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 51) is GRANTED in part and 2 Plaintiff’s request for economic damages will not be presented to the jury. The 3 remainder of Defendants’ Supplemental Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. 4 5 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 6 Dated April 26, 2021. 7 8 9 A Marsha J. Pechman United States Senior District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING IN PART DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?