Hurn v. Haynes

Filing 33

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS re 27 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. 3 ) and his motion to expand the record (Dkt. [ 17]) are DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice; In accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Chad Hurn, Prisoner ID: 884673)(SR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 CHAD WAYNE HURN, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, v. Case No. C19-1942-RAJ ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS RONALD HAYNES, Respondent. 15 16 17 18 The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner’s motion to expand the record, all briefing of the parties, the Report and 19 Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, objections 20 thereto, and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS: 21 (1) The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; 22 (2) Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. 3) and his motion to 23 expand the record (Dkt. 17) are DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice; ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS - 1 1 2 3 4 (3) In accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler. 5 6 7 DATED this 26th day of April, 2021. 8 A 9 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?