Carpenters Health and Security Trust of Western Washington et al v. Hi-Tech Erectors Corporation et al
Filing
6
ORDER Vacating Writ of Garnishment signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik re 5 MOTION To Return Funds To Garnishee..(GT)
1
Honorable Robert S. Lasnik
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
11
12
CARPENTERS HEALTH AND SECURITY
TRUST OF WESTERN WASHINGTON;
CARPENTERS RETIREMENT TRUST OF
WESTERN WASHINGTON; CARPENTERSEMPLOYERS VACATION TRUST OF
WESTERN WASHINGTON; and
CARPENTERS-EMPLOYERS
APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING TRUST
OF WESTERN WASHINGTON,
13
14
15
v.
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF
GARNISHMENT
Plaintiffs,
HI-TECH ERECTORS CORPORATION, a
Washington corporation,
16
17
Case No. 2:19-mc-00003 RSL
Defendant.
HOMESTREET BANK,
Garnishee.
18
19
This matter is before the Court on the motion of the Plaintiff Carpenters Trusts of
20
Western Washington (the” Carpenters Trusts”) to return garnished funds to Defendant Hi-
21
Tech Erectors Corporation (“Hi-Tech”) via the garnishee, Homestreet Bank, because the
22
Parties have settled their dispute.
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT – 1
1700 026 ud021902
McKENZIE ROTHWELL
BARLOW & COUGHRAN, P.S.
1325 FOURTH AVE., SUITE 910
SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 224-9900
1
2
The Court has considered the motion, as well as the pleadings, files, and court
records in this matter. Being otherwise advised, the Court ORDERS:
3
1.
The Carpenters Trusts’ motion is GRANTED;
4
2.
The writ of garnishment (Dkt. #3) is canceled;
5
3.
Garnishee Homestreet Bank is directed to promptly return the
$4,560.80 held pursuant to the writ of garnishment to Defendant HiTech Erectors Corporation; and
4.
The Clerk of Court shall close the case.
6
7
8
Dated: April 3, 2019.
ALasnik
Honorable Robert S.
9
10
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT – 2
1700 026 ud021902
McKENZIE ROTHWELL
BARLOW & COUGHRAN, P.S.
1325 FOURTH AVE., SUITE 910
SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 224-9900
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?