United States of America v. Sparks et al

Filing 11

ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDINGS signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik re 10 Motion (CDA)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-mc-00121-RSL Document 11 Filed 05/15/20 Page 1 of 2 1 The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 Defendant/Judgment Debtor, 15 16 17 and MIDLAND NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Garnishee. 18 19 20 21 22 23 This matter came before the Court on the United States’ Application to Terminate Garnishment Proceeding. For the reasons stated in the United States’ Application, the Court concludes that this Garnishment should be terminated, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(C). 24 25 26 27 28 (2:18-CR-0107-1) Order Terminating Garnishment Proceeding RANDY SPARKS, 14 NO. 2:19-MC-00121-RSL IT IS ORDERED that the garnishment is terminated and that Midland National Life Insurance Company is relieved of further responsibility pursuant to this garnishment. // ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v. Randy Sparks and Midland National Life Insurance Company, USDC#: 2:19-MC-00121-RSL/2:18-CR-0107-1) - 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970 Case 2:19-mc-00121-RSL Document 11 Filed 05/15/20 Page 2 of 2 1 Dated this 15th day of May, 2020. 2 3 AS. LASNIK JUDGE ROBERT 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 Presented by: s/ Kyle A. Forsyth KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609 Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v. Randy Sparks and Midland National Life Insurance Company, USDC#: 2:19-MC-00121-RSL/2:18-CR-0107-1) - 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?