Hannon v. Versteeg et al
Filing
18
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 17 MOTION for Status Report re 16 MOTION for Default Judgment. Authorized by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
Case 2:20-cv-00136-RAJ Document 18 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 2
Hon. Richard A. Jones
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
JAMES TYLER HANNON,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
No. 2:20-cv-00136-RAJ
v.
MINUTE ORDER
KORY VERSTEEG, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
The clerk issues the following minute order by the authority of the Honorable
Richard A. Jones, United States District Court Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Status
18
Report on Default Judgment Against In Personam Defendant Kory Versteeg
19
(Dkt. # 17). Plaintiff’s motion sets forth that Plaintiff’s counsel “has received no
20
response to repeated phone calls made pursuant to LCR 7(b)(5).” Pursuant to Local
21
Rule 7(b)(5), inquiries regarding the status of pending motions are to be made to the
22
23
24
assigned judge’s courtroom deputy clerk. Counsel does not indicate to whom the
telephone calls were placed, but they were not made to the courtroom deputy clerk.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment remains scheduled for the Court’s
determination. The Court will issue an order on the motion at its earliest
25
opportunity.
26
MINUTE ORDER – 1
Case 2:20-cv-00136-RAJ Document 18 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Should Plaintiff wish any further updates, counsel is directed to contact this
2
Court’s courtroom deputy clerk, Victoria Ericksen, at
3
victoria_ericksen@wawd.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff’s Motion for Status Report
4
(Dkt. # 17) is DENIED as moot.
5
6
DATED this 7th day of January, 2021.
7
WILLIAM M. McCOOL,
Clerk of the Court
8
9
/s/ Victoria Ericksen
Deputy Clerk to Hon. Richard A. Jones
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER – 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?