Anuruddha v. ICE Field Office Director
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re 4 Report and Recommendations by Judge Richard A. Jones. The Court DECLINES to adopt the Report and Recommendation as moot; Petitioners application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 3) is GRANTED; This matter is RE-REFERRED to Judge Peterson for further proceedings. (cc: Petitioner via USPS)(SG)
Case 2:20-cv-00447-RAJ-MLP Document 8 Filed 05/13/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
BARUA ANURUDDHA,
9
Petitioner,
10
11
v.
ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR,
12
Case No. C20-447-RAJ-MLP
ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS
Respondent.
13
14
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L.
15
Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections or responses to that, and the
16
remaining record, the Court finds and ORDERS:
17
18
(1)
The Report and Recommendation recommended that Petitioner Barua
Anuruddha’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) be denied because Mr.
19
Anuruddha failed to pay the $5.00 IFP filing fee;
20
(2)
Since the entry of the Report and Recommendation, Mr. Anuruddha has
21
22
paid that filing fee (Dkt. # 7);
(3)
23
The Court thus DECLINES to adopt the Report and Recommendation as
moot;
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 1
Case 2:20-cv-00447-RAJ-MLP Document 8 Filed 05/13/20 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
(4)
Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 3) is
GRANTED;
(5)
This matter is RE-REFERRED to Judge Peterson for further proceedings;
(6)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner and to Judge
Peterson.
6
Dated this the 13th day of May, 2020.
7
A
8
9
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?