Anuruddha v. ICE Field Office Director

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re 4 Report and Recommendations by Judge Richard A. Jones. The Court DECLINES to adopt the Report and Recommendation as moot; Petitioners application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 3) is GRANTED; This matter is RE-REFERRED to Judge Peterson for further proceedings. (cc: Petitioner via USPS)(SG)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00447-RAJ-MLP Document 8 Filed 05/13/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 BARUA ANURUDDHA, 9 Petitioner, 10 11 v. ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, 12 Case No. C20-447-RAJ-MLP ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Respondent. 13 14 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. 15 Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections or responses to that, and the 16 remaining record, the Court finds and ORDERS: 17 18 (1) The Report and Recommendation recommended that Petitioner Barua Anuruddha’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) be denied because Mr. 19 Anuruddha failed to pay the $5.00 IFP filing fee; 20 (2) Since the entry of the Report and Recommendation, Mr. Anuruddha has 21 22 paid that filing fee (Dkt. # 7); (3) 23 The Court thus DECLINES to adopt the Report and Recommendation as moot; ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 1 Case 2:20-cv-00447-RAJ-MLP Document 8 Filed 05/13/20 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 (4) Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 3) is GRANTED; (5) This matter is RE-REFERRED to Judge Peterson for further proceedings; (6) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner and to Judge Peterson. 6 Dated this the 13th day of May, 2020. 7 A 8 9 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?