Oakes v. Holbrook
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER re Petitioner's 29 REPLY and MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing. Petitioner's Reply and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (dkt. # 29 ) are RE-NOTED on the Court's calendar for consideration on 12/3/2021. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of his answer by that date. Authorized by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (SR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
MICHIEL GLEN OAKES,
Petitioner,
9
10
11
Case No. C20-996-JCC-MLP
MINUTE ORDER
v.
DONALD R. HOLBROOK,
Respondent.
12
13
14
15
16
The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Hon. Michelle L.
Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge:
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s “Reply and Motion for Evidentiary
17
Hearing.” (Dkt. # 29.) This Court previously noted Petitioner’s habeas petition for the Court’s
18
consideration on November 29, 2021, and allowed Respondent to file a reply brief by that date.
19
(Dkt. # 28.) However, Petitioner’s filed reply brief includes a motion for evidentiary hearing
20
which was improperly noted for November 29, 2021. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(d), with the
21
exception of the motions explicitly listed in LCR 7(d)(1), 7(d)(2), and 7(d)(3), all other motions
22
shall be noted for consideration on a date no earlier than the third Friday after filing and service
23
of the motion.
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
Therefore, based on the filing of Petitioner’s Reply and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing,
2
and in the interest of judicial efficiency, Respondent’s Answer (dkt. # 14) and Petitioner’s Reply
3
and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (dkt. # 29) are RE-NOTED on the Court’s calendar for
4
consideration on December 3, 2021. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of his
5
answer by that date.
6
Dated this 19th day of November, 2021.
7
Ravi Subramanian
Clerk of Court
8
By: /s/Tim Farrell
Deputy Clerk
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?