Oakes v. Holbrook
Filing
37
ORDER granting Petitioner's 36 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motions and Briefs. Petitioner's overlength surreply (dkt. # 35 ) is accepted as filed. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (SR)
Case 2:20-cv-00996-JCC-MLP Document 37 Filed 01/03/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
MICHIEL GLEN OAKES,
Petitioner,
9
11
ORDER
v.
10
Case No. C20-996-JCC-MLP
DONALD R. HOLBROOK,
Respondent.
12
13
14
This is a federal habeas action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is before the
15
Court on Petitioner Michiel Glen Oakes’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Overlength
16
Surreply (“Petitioner’s Motion”). (Dkt. # 36.) On December 6, 2021, this Court granted
17
Petitioner leave to file a surreply addressing the time either included or excluded for the tolling
18
of the federal statute of limitations to file a habeas petition. (Dkt. # 34.) Petitioner’s Motion
19
requests that the Court grant leave to file a surreply in excess of the three-page limit authorized
20
under Local Civil Rule 7(g)(3). 1 (Dkt. # 36 at 1-2.) Petitioner argues that leave is warranted due
21
to this matter’s complicated procedural history. (Dkt. # 36 at 2.)
22
23
Petitioner’s Motion does not articulate the specific number of pages requested in excess of the limit, as
required by LCR 7(g)(2). (See dkt. # 36 at 1-2.) Nevertheless, the Court notes a nine-page surreply was
filed concurrently with Petitioner’s Motion. (See dkt. # 35.)
1
ORDER - 1
Case 2:20-cv-00996-JCC-MLP Document 37 Filed 01/03/22 Page 2 of 2
1
Based on Petitioner’s Motion, and that Respondent has no opposition, the Court hereby
2
ORDERS that Petitioner’s Motion (dkt. # 36) is GRANTED. Petitioner’s overlength surreply
3
(dkt. # 35) is accepted as filed.
4
Dated this 3rd day of January, 2022.
5
A
6
MICHELLE L. PETERSON
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?