Briggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Stipulated Motion to Remand signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (KMP)
Case 2:20-cv-01132-MAT Document 16 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
SEATTLE DIVISION
6
7
8
9
JENNIFER B.,
Civil No. 2:20-cv-01132-MAT
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
ORDER
12
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
13
Defendant.
14
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned
15
case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to
16
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Appeals Council will instruct the administrative law
17
judge to reassess the opinions of record, including those of Seunghyun-Steve Lee, M.D., and
18
Scott D. Weber, M.D., and explain the weight afforded to each of these opinions; reevaluate
19
Plaintiff’s symptoms, consistent with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529 and SSR 16-3p; reassess Plaintiff’s
20
residual functional capacity consistent with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 and SSR 96-8p; and proceed
21
with the sequential evaluation, as necessary.
22
23
24
Page 1
ORDER - [2:20-CV-01132-MAT]
Case 2:20-cv-01132-MAT Document 16 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Upon proper application, the Court will consider whether reasonable attorney fees should
2
be awarded pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Judgment shall be
3
entered for Plaintiff.
4
DATED this 7th day of January, 2021.
5
A
6
Mary Alice Theiler
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Presented by:
s/ Lisa Goldoftas
LISA GOLDOFTAS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A
Seattle, WA 98104-7075
Telephone: (206) 615-3858
Fax: (206) 615-2531
lisa.goldoftas@ssa.gov
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Page 2
ORDER - [2:20-CV-01132-MAT]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?