Wright v. State of Washington et al
Filing
29
ORDER granting Parties' 28 Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 7/26/2021, Discovery Motions due by 8/9/2021, Discovery to be completed by 9/8/2021, Dispositive motions due by 10/8/2021. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (SR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
MATTHEW WRIGHT,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,
Defendants.
11
Case No. C20-1452-JCC-MLP
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING
ORDER
12
13
This is a civil rights action proceeding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter comes before
14
the Court at the present time on the parties’ stipulated motion to amend the Court’s previously
15
issued pretrial scheduling order. (See Dkt. ## 14, 28.) It appears from the record that good cause
16
exists to amend the scheduling order given that the Court recently granted Plaintiff leave to
17
amend his complaint to add new claims to this action. Accordingly, the parties’ stipulated motion
18
to amend the pretrial scheduling order (dkt. # 28) is GRANTED, and the pretrial schedule is
19
amended as follows:
Event
20
Date
21
Expert disclosures
7/26/2021
22
All motions related to discovery must be filed by this date
and noted for consideration no later than the third Friday
thereafter (see LCR7(d))
8/9/2021
23
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION
TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER - 1
1
Discovery to be completed by
9/8/2021
2
All dispositive motions must be filed by this date
and noted for consideration no later than the fourth Friday
thereafter (see LCR 7(d))
10/8/2021
3
4
5
6
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to the
Honorable John C. Coughenour.
DATED this 27th day of April, 2021.
7
A
8
MICHELLE L. PETERSON
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION
TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?