Wright v. State of Washington et al

Filing 29

ORDER granting Parties' 28 Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 7/26/2021, Discovery Motions due by 8/9/2021, Discovery to be completed by 9/8/2021, Dispositive motions due by 10/8/2021. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (SR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 MATTHEW WRIGHT, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants. 11 Case No. C20-1452-JCC-MLP ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 12 13 This is a civil rights action proceeding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter comes before 14 the Court at the present time on the parties’ stipulated motion to amend the Court’s previously 15 issued pretrial scheduling order. (See Dkt. ## 14, 28.) It appears from the record that good cause 16 exists to amend the scheduling order given that the Court recently granted Plaintiff leave to 17 amend his complaint to add new claims to this action. Accordingly, the parties’ stipulated motion 18 to amend the pretrial scheduling order (dkt. # 28) is GRANTED, and the pretrial schedule is 19 amended as follows: Event 20 Date 21 Expert disclosures 7/26/2021 22 All motions related to discovery must be filed by this date and noted for consideration no later than the third Friday thereafter (see LCR7(d)) 8/9/2021 23 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER - 1 1 Discovery to be completed by 9/8/2021 2 All dispositive motions must be filed by this date and noted for consideration no later than the fourth Friday thereafter (see LCR 7(d)) 10/8/2021 3 4 5 6 The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to the Honorable John C. Coughenour. DATED this 27th day of April, 2021. 7 A 8 MICHELLE L. PETERSON United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?