Williams v. Wofford

Filing 22

ORDER granting Petitioner's 20 Second Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner is directed to file her response to Respondent's answer by 6/28/2021. Respondent's answer (dkt. # 14 ) is RE-NOTED on the Court's calendar for consideration on 7/2/2021. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of her answer by that date. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 CARRI WILLIAMS, Petitioner, 8 9 v. 10 JO WOFFORD, Respondent. 11 Case No. C20-1477-RSL-MLP ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 12 13 This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter comes before 14 the Court at the present time on Petitioner’s second motion for an extension of time to file a 15 response to Respondent’s answer to Petitioner’s federal habeas petition. (Dkt. # 20.) Respondent 16 does not oppose the requested extension. (See Dkt. # 21, ¶ 12.) The Court, having considered 17 Petitioner’s motion, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as follows: 18 19 20 (1) Petitioner’s second motion for extension of time (dkt. # 20) is GRANTED. Petitioner is directed to file her response to Respondent’s answer not later than June 28, 2021. (2) Respondent’s answer (dkt. # 14) is RE-NOTED on the Court’s calendar for 21 consideration on July 2, 2021. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of her answer by 22 that date. 23 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 1 2 3 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record, and to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik. DATED this 4th day of June, 2021. 4 A 5 MICHELLE L. PETERSON United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?