Williams v. Wofford
Filing
22
ORDER granting Petitioner's 20 Second Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner is directed to file her response to Respondent's answer by 6/28/2021. Respondent's answer (dkt. # 14 ) is RE-NOTED on the Court's calendar for consideration on 7/2/2021. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of her answer by that date. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (LH)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
CARRI WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
8
9
v.
10
JO WOFFORD,
Respondent.
11
Case No. C20-1477-RSL-MLP
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME
12
13
This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter comes before
14
the Court at the present time on Petitioner’s second motion for an extension of time to file a
15
response to Respondent’s answer to Petitioner’s federal habeas petition. (Dkt. # 20.) Respondent
16
does not oppose the requested extension. (See Dkt. # 21, ¶ 12.) The Court, having considered
17
Petitioner’s motion, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as follows:
18
19
20
(1)
Petitioner’s second motion for extension of time (dkt. # 20) is GRANTED.
Petitioner is directed to file her response to Respondent’s answer not later than June 28, 2021.
(2)
Respondent’s answer (dkt. # 14) is RE-NOTED on the Court’s calendar for
21
consideration on July 2, 2021. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of her answer by
22
that date.
23
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME - 1
1
2
3
(3)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record, and to
the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik.
DATED this 4th day of June, 2021.
4
A
5
MICHELLE L. PETERSON
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?