Michelle v. South Correctional Entity et al

Filing 31

ORDER: The court GRANTS Mr. Michelle's unopposed motion to dismiss the SCORE Defendants from this action without prejudice and to file a second amended complaint (Dkt. # 28 ). Mr. Michelle shall file his second amended complaint within five (5) court days of the filing date of this order. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-00140-JLR Document 31 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 DUSTIN MICHELLE, 11 v. 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER SOUTH CORRECTIONAL ENTITY, et al., 14 15 Plaintiff, CASE NO. C21-0140JLR Defendants. Before the court is Plaintiff Dustin Michelle’s motion to temporarily dismiss Defendants South Correctional Entity (“SCORE”) and SCORE John Does 1-10 (collectively, “the SCORE Defendants”) from this action without prejudice and for leave to file a second amended complaint. (Mot. (Dkt. # 28); see Bingham Decl. (Dkt. # 29) ¶¶ 4-5, Ex. A (“Prop. 2d Am. Compl.”).) None of the Defendants have responded to Mr. 21 22 ORDER - 1 Case 2:21-cv-00140-JLR Document 31 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 3 1 Michelle’s motion. 1 (See generally Dkt.) The court has considered the motion, all 2 submissions filed in support of the motion, the relevant portions of the record, and the 3 applicable law. Being fully advised, the court GRANTS Mr. Michelle’s motion. 4 Once an opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary 5 judgment, the plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss his claims only by stipulation between all 6 the parties who have appeared or by “court order, on terms that the court considers 7 proper.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). A party may also amend its pleading once as a matter of 8 course within 21 days after serving it, or “if the pleading is one to which a responsive 9 pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after 10 service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 15(a)(1). Otherwise, “a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s 12 written consent or the court’s leave.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). “The court should freely 13 give leave when justice so requires.” Id. 14 Here, Mr. Michelle contends that dismissal of the SCORE Defendants is 15 necessary to ensure compliance with RCW 4.96.020, which forbids a plaintiff from 16 bringing claims for damages against a local government entity until 60 days after filing 17 a tort claim form with the agent designated to accept such claims. (Mot. at 1-2.) Mr. 18 Michelle’s attorney states that he believed he properly filed his tort claim form by serving 19 it on SCORE’s counsel but later learned that SCORE did not believe service on its 20 21 22 1 “[I]f a party fails to file papers in opposition to a motion, such failure may be considered by the court as an admission that the motion has merit.” Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(b)(2). ORDER - 2 Case 2:21-cv-00140-JLR Document 31 Filed 09/08/21 Page 3 of 3 1 counsel was valid under RCW 4.96.020. (Bingham Decl. ¶¶ 2-3.) Accordingly, on May 2 10, 2021, Mr. Michelle’s attorney filed another copy of the tort claim form on SCORE’s 3 designated agent to ensure compliance with the statute. (Id. ¶ 3.) Mr. Michelle’s 4 proposed second amended complaint adds allegations related to service of the tort claim 5 form. (See Prop. 2d Am. Compl. ¶¶ 133-35.) 6 The court GRANTS Mr. Michelle’s unopposed motion to dismiss the SCORE 7 Defendants from this action without prejudice and to file a second amended complaint 8 (Dkt. # 28). Mr. Michelle shall file his second amended complaint within five (5) court 9 days of the filing date of this order. In granting Mr. Michelle’s motion, the court takes no 10 position regarding whether dismissal of his claims and amendment of his complaint are 11 sufficient to meet the requirements of RCW 4.96.020. 12 Dated this 8th day of September, 2021. 13 A 14 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?