Tori Belle Cosmetics LLC v. McKnight

Filing 18

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER granting Defendant's #17 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC shall be Friday, 4/9/2021. Initial Disclosures Deadline is 4/16/2021, Joint Status Report due by 4/16/2021. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TORI BELLE COSMETICS LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. CYNTHIA MCKNIGHT, a New Hampshire citizen; ASHLEY BURDINE, an Idaho citizen; LYNDSEY YOCOM, a Virginia citizen; AMBER MICHELE MIRAYA, an Idaho citizen, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:21-cv-00145-RSL WHEREAS, on March 4, 2021, Plaintiff Tori Belle Cosmetics LLC (“Tori Belle”) filed a First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned lawsuit (the “FAC”) against Defendants Cynthia McKnight, Ashley Burdine, Lyndsey Yocom, and Amber Michelle Miraya (collectively, the “Defendants” and, together with Tori Belle, the “Parties”). WHEREAS, in an effort to conserve judicial, party, and attorney resources, Tori Belle and Defendants are discussing potential resolutions of this matter that may obviate the need for further litigation. WHEREAS, in light of the above and subject to the Court’s approval, the Parties have agreed that it would be in their mutual interest to extend the Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC and corresponding case deadlines. STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER (No. 2:21-cv-00145-RSL) – 1 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Phone: 206.359.8000 Fax: 206.359.9000 1 NOW, THEREFORE, Tori Belle and Defendants stipulate as follows: 2 1. 3 4 5 6 Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC shall be Friday, April 9, 2021. 2. The Parties agree to, and with the Court’s permission shall, exchange initial disclosures no later than Friday, April 16, 2021. 3. The Parties agree to, and with the Court’s permission shall, file their Joint Status 7 Report no later than Friday, April 16, 2021. 8 DATED: March 30, 2021 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 s/ James F. Williams James F. Williams, WSBA No. 23613 Zachary E. Davison, WSBA No.47873 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Email: JWilliams@perkinscoie.com ZDavison@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Defendants 17 18 19 s/ Peter A. Talevich Peter A. Talevich, WSBA No. 42644 Daniel-Charles v. Wolf, WSBA No. 48211 K&L Gates LLP 925 Fourth Ave., Suite 2900 Seattle, WA 98104-1158 Phone: (206) 623-7580 peter.talevich@klgates.com dc.wolf@klgates.com Desiree F. Moore (pro hac vice) K&L Gates LLP 70 West Madison Street, Suite 3300 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Phone: (312) 372-1121 desiree.moore@klgates.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER (No. 2:21-cv-00145-RSL) – 2 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Phone: 206.359.8000 Fax: 206.359.9000 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is so ordered. Dated this 31st day of March, 2021. 4 5 THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Presented by: s/James F. Williams James F. Williams, WSBA No. 23613 Zachary E. Davison, WSBA No.47873 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Email: JWilliams@perkinscoie.com ZDavison@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER (No. 2:21-cv-00145-RSL) – 3 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Phone: 206.359.8000 Fax: 206.359.9000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?