Amazon.com Inc et al v. Yong et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 39 Fifth Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/27/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/20/2023, Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan due by 3/27/2023. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-00170-RSM Document 40 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 3 The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation; and SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A., an Italian corporation, v. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiffs, LI YONG, an individual d/b/a PHIL BALDINIE; YANTAITIANMINGWANGLUOKEJIYOUXI ANGONGSI, a Chinese entity d/b/a PHIL BALDINIE; WU PIANPIAN, an individual d/b/a HEFEI YANZI TRADING COMPANY; HEFEIZANZISHANGMAOYOUXIANGONGS I, a Chinese entity d/b/a HEFEI YANZI TRADING COMPANY; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 18 19 Lead Consolidated Case No. 2:21-cv-00170-RSM AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation; and SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A., an Italian corporation, v. Member Consolidated Case: 2:21-cv-00171-RSM Plaintiffs, ZHAO HAO JUN, an individual d/b/a ZHAOHA032OJUN; ZHANG LIANFA, an individual d/b/a CANGZHOUSHUOFENGDIANZIKEJIZZX; CANGZHOUSHUOFENGDIANZIKEJIYOUXI ANGONGSI, a Chinese entity; GUOXIN DAI, an individual; and DOES 1-10, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH EX PARTE MOTION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF INITIAL CASE DEADLINES Defendants. 27 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF INITIAL CASE DEADLINES- 1 (No. 2:21-cv-00170-RSM) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1640 206.622.3150 main ꞏ 206.757.7700 fax Case 2:21-cv-00170-RSM Document 40 Filed 11/30/22 Page 2 of 3 1 This matter came before the Court on consideration of Plaintiffs Amazon.com, Inc.’s 2 (“Amazon”) and Salvatore Ferragamo S.p.A.’s (“Ferragamo”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Fifth 3 Ex Parte Motion to Extend Deadlines for the parties’ Rule 26(f) conference, initial disclosures, 4 and combined joint status report and discovery plan, and for good cause shown, it is hereby 5 ORDERED that: 6 The Motion is GRANTED. The Court extends the current deadlines for the parties to 7 confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), serve initial disclosures pursuant to 8 26(a)(1), and file a joint status report as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and 9 Local Civil Rule 26(f), as follows: 10 11 Deadline Current Date Revised Date 12 FRCP 26(f) Conference November 29, 2022 February 27, 2023 Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) December 19, 2022 March 20, 2023 Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 26(f) December 26, 2022 March 27, 2023 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 SO ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2022. A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF INITIAL CASE DEADLINES- 2 (No. 2:21-cv-00170-RSM) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1640 206.622.3150 main ꞏ 206.757.7700 fax Case 2:21-cv-00170-RSM Document 40 Filed 11/30/22 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Presented by: DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs s/ Scott R. Commerson Scott R. Commerson, WSBA #58085 865 S Figueroa Street, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel: (213) 633-6890 Email: scottcommerson@dwt.com s/ Olivia M. Powar Olivia M. Powar, WSBA #59504 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1604 Tel: (206) 622-3150 Fax: (206) 757-7700 Email: oliviapowar@dwt.com 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF INITIAL CASE DEADLINES- 3 (No. 2:21-cv-00170-RSM) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1640 206.622.3150 main ꞏ 206.757.7700 fax

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?