Amazon.com Inc et al v. Yong et al
Filing
40
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 39 Fifth Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/27/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/20/2023, Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan due by 3/27/2023. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
Case 2:21-cv-00170-RSM Document 40 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 3
The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation;
and SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A., an
Italian corporation,
v.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiffs,
LI YONG, an individual d/b/a PHIL BALDINIE;
YANTAITIANMINGWANGLUOKEJIYOUXI
ANGONGSI, a Chinese entity d/b/a PHIL
BALDINIE; WU PIANPIAN, an individual d/b/a
HEFEI YANZI TRADING COMPANY;
HEFEIZANZISHANGMAOYOUXIANGONGS
I, a Chinese entity d/b/a HEFEI YANZI
TRADING COMPANY; and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
18
19
Lead Consolidated Case No.
2:21-cv-00170-RSM
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation;
and SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A., an
Italian corporation,
v.
Member Consolidated Case:
2:21-cv-00171-RSM
Plaintiffs,
ZHAO HAO JUN, an individual d/b/a
ZHAOHA032OJUN; ZHANG LIANFA, an
individual d/b/a
CANGZHOUSHUOFENGDIANZIKEJIZZX;
CANGZHOUSHUOFENGDIANZIKEJIYOUXI
ANGONGSI, a Chinese entity; GUOXIN DAI,
an individual; and DOES 1-10,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
FIFTH EX PARTE MOTION FOR
FURTHER EXTENSION OF INITIAL
CASE DEADLINES
Defendants.
27
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH EX PARTE MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF INITIAL CASE DEADLINES- 1
(No. 2:21-cv-00170-RSM)
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98104-1640
206.622.3150 main ꞏ 206.757.7700 fax
Case 2:21-cv-00170-RSM Document 40 Filed 11/30/22 Page 2 of 3
1
This matter came before the Court on consideration of Plaintiffs Amazon.com, Inc.’s
2
(“Amazon”) and Salvatore Ferragamo S.p.A.’s (“Ferragamo”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Fifth
3
Ex Parte Motion to Extend Deadlines for the parties’ Rule 26(f) conference, initial disclosures,
4
and combined joint status report and discovery plan, and for good cause shown, it is hereby
5
ORDERED that:
6
The Motion is GRANTED. The Court extends the current deadlines for the parties to
7
confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), serve initial disclosures pursuant to
8
26(a)(1), and file a joint status report as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and
9
Local Civil Rule 26(f), as follows:
10
11
Deadline
Current Date
Revised Date
12
FRCP 26(f) Conference
November 29, 2022
February 27, 2023
Initial Disclosures Pursuant
to FRCP 26(a)(1)
December 19, 2022
March 20, 2023
Combined Joint Status
Report and Discovery Plan
as Required by FRCP 26(f)
and Local Civil Rule 26(f)
December 26, 2022
March 27, 2023
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
SO ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2022.
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH EX PARTE MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF INITIAL CASE DEADLINES- 2
(No. 2:21-cv-00170-RSM)
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98104-1640
206.622.3150 main ꞏ 206.757.7700 fax
Case 2:21-cv-00170-RSM Document 40 Filed 11/30/22 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Presented by:
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
s/ Scott R. Commerson
Scott R. Commerson, WSBA #58085
865 S Figueroa Street, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel: (213) 633-6890
Email: scottcommerson@dwt.com
s/ Olivia M. Powar
Olivia M. Powar, WSBA #59504
920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98104-1604
Tel: (206) 622-3150
Fax: (206) 757-7700
Email: oliviapowar@dwt.com
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH EX PARTE MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF INITIAL CASE DEADLINES- 3
(No. 2:21-cv-00170-RSM)
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98104-1640
206.622.3150 main ꞏ 206.757.7700 fax
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?