Railcar Management LLC v. Does 1-10
Filing
207
MINUTE ORDER Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly:Plaintiff's 178 MOTION for Reconsideration, as amended, docket no. 182 -1, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: The Court RECONSIDERS its earlier ruling, and rather than g ranting judgment on the pleadings in favor of Cedar AI, the Court DISMISSES the CFAA § 1030(a)(5)(C) claim without prejudice and with leave to amend; Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is otherwise DENIED. Any amended complaint shall be electronically filed within seven (7) days of the date of this Minute Order;Cedar AI's 190 MOTION to Compel, as submitted in unredacted form, docket no. 197 , is DEFERRED and RENOTED to June 30, 2023. On or before May 30, 2023, Cedar AI shall file a list designating up to twenty (20) privilege log entries. By June 16, 2023, plaintiff shall provide to the Court for in camera review the communications or documents associated with the privilege log entries designated by Cedar AI. C edar AI may file a response, on or before June 26, 2023. Plaintiff may file a reply by June 30, 2023;Plaintiff's unopposed 192 MOTION to Seal is GRANTED. Exhibits GT to the Declaration of Mary G. Kaiser, docket nos. 195 195 -13, an d the unredacted version of plaintiff's response, docket no. 202 , to Cedar AI's motion to compel, shall remain sealed;Parties' 203 Stipulated MOTION Regarding the Non-Disclosure of Certain Information Regarding Expert Wit nesses, has been made part of the record;Parties' 204 Stipulated MOTION to Modify Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates, is GRANTED, as follows: Jury Trial (10 days) is set for 1/22/2024 before Judge Thomas S. Zi lly. Discovery Motions due by 6/15/2023, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 7/31/2023, Discovery completed by 9/27/2023, Dispositive motions due by 10/5/2023, Motions related to expert witnesses due by 10/12/2023, Motions in Limine due by 12/21/2023, Pretrial Order due by 1/5/2024, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 1/5/2024, Pretrial Conference set for 1/12/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (MJV)
Case 2:21-cv-00437-TSZ Document 207 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
RAILCAR MANAGEMENT, LLC,
8
Plaintiff,
v.
9
CEDAR AI, INC.; MARIO PONTICELLO;
DARIL VILHENA; and YI CHEN,
10
Defendants,
11
C21-0437 TSZ
MINUTE ORDER
v.
12
WABTEC CORPORATION,
13
Third-Party Defendant.
14
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
15 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
16
17
(1)
Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, 1 docket no. 178, as amended, docket
no. 182-1, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
(a)
With regard to plaintiff’s claim against defendant Cedar AI, Inc.
(“Cedar AI”) under 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(C), a provision of the Counterfeit
Access Device and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984 (“CFAA”), the Court
18
19
1
In support of its motion for reconsideration, plaintiff has offered declarations by one of its
attorneys and by a senior director at Wabtec Corporation, plaintiff’s parent company. See Harris
21 Decl. (docket no. 180); Parker Decl. (docket no. 179). Neither declaration contains new facts
that “could not have been brought to [the Court’s] attention earlier with reasonable diligence.”
Local Civil Rule 7(h)(1). These declarations are neither timely submitted nor appropriate for
22 consideration with respect to the underlying Rule 12(c) motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d).
20
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
Case 2:21-cv-00437-TSZ Document 207 Filed 05/18/23 Page 2 of 4
1
RECONSIDERS its earlier ruling, and rather than granting judgment on the
pleadings in favor of Cedar AI, the Court DISMISSES the CFAA § 1030(a)(5)(C)
claim without prejudice and with leave to amend;
2
(b)
3
Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is otherwise DENIED;
(c)
Any amended complaint shall not include or replead claims that
have been dismissed or as to which judgment on the pleadings has been granted
against plaintiff, 2 and it shall be electronically filed within seven (7) days of the
date of this Minute Order; and
4
5
6
(d)
Any responsive pleading or motion shall be filed within fourteen
(14) days after any amended complaint is filed.
7
(2)
Cedar AI’s motion to compel, docket no. 190, as submitted in unredacted
8 form, docket no. 197, is DEFERRED and RENOTED to June 30, 2023. The Court
DIRECTS the parties as follows:
9
(a)
On or before May 30, 2023, Cedar AI shall file a list designating
10
up to twenty (20) privilege log entries that it believes relate to communications or
documents not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine.
11
(b)
By June 16, 2023, plaintiff shall provide to the Court for in camera
review the communications or documents associated with the privilege log entries
12
designated by Cedar AI. The materials shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office in
an envelope marked “FOR HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY – IN CAMERA
13
REVIEW.” Plaintiff shall contemporaneously file a supplemental brief, not to
exceed ten (10) pages in length, identifying with particularity the persons involved
14
in the communications at issue (i.e., their names, employers, positions, and roles in
the underlying events and/or this litigation) and explaining why it asserts attorney15
client privilege and/or the work product doctrine with respect to the designated
documents. Cedar AI may file a response, not to exceed ten (10) pages in length,
16
on or before June 26, 2023. Plaintiff may file a reply, not to exceed five (5) pages
in length, by June 30, 2023.
17
18
19
2
By Order entered March 16, 2023, docket no. 170, the Court dismissed any CFAA claims
20 brought under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030(a)(1), (a)(2)(A), (a)(2)(B), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(5)(A), (a)(5)(B),
(a)(6) and (a)(7), granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants Mario Ponticello,
21 Daril Vilhena, and Yi Chen on plaintiff’s first (CFAA), second (Stored Communications Act
(“SCA”)), fifth (Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”)), seventh (trespass-to-chattels), and eighth
(negligence) claims, and granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of Cedar AI on plaintiff’s
22 SCA and CPA claims.
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Case 2:21-cv-00437-TSZ Document 207 Filed 05/18/23 Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
(c)
The Court’s in camera review of the designated items shall serve as
a litmus test for whether attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine
have been appropriately invoked. The Court will consider extending its ruling on
the twenty selected log entries to all other, non-designated, entries and associated
materials, as well as awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party.
Counsel shall continue to meet and confer and attempt in good faith to narrow the
scope of or resolve this dispute without the Court’s involvement, and they shall
immediately notify the Court if in camera review is no longer necessary.
(3)
Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to seal, docket no. 192, is GRANTED, and
6 Exhibits G–T to the Declaration of Mary G. Kaiser, docket nos. 195 – 195-13, and the
unredacted version of plaintiff’s response, docket no. 202, to Cedar AI’s motion to
7 compel, shall remain sealed. The Court makes no ruling, however, regarding whether
any of these materials will be unsealed at a later date so that any order concerning
8 Cedar AI’s motion to compel may be filed for public view.
9
10
11
(4)
The parties have entered into a stipulation, docket no. 203, concerning
expert witnesses. The stipulation has been made part of the record.
(5)
The parties’ stipulated motion, docket no. 204, to continue the trial date and
related deadlines, is GRANTED, as follows:
JURY TRIAL DATE (10 days)
January 22, 2024
Discovery motions filing deadline
June 15, 2023
Disclosure of expert testimony
July 31, 2023
Discovery completion deadline
September 27, 2023
17
Dispositive motions filing deadline
October 5, 2023
18
Deadline for filing motions related to expert
testimony (e.g., Daubert motions)
October 12, 2023
Motions in limine filing deadline
December 21, 2023
Agreed pretrial order due
January 5, 2024
12
13
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 3
Case 2:21-cv-00437-TSZ Document 207 Filed 05/18/23 Page 4 of 4
1
2
3
Trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, and
jury instructions due
January 5, 2024
Pretrial conference
January 12, 2024
at 10:00 a.m.
4 All other previously-set deadlines have expired. The provisions of the Minute Order
Setting Trial and Related Dates, docket no. 75, concerning any alteration of the case
5 schedule and the need for counsel to be prepared to commence trial on the date set, the
agreed pretrial order and the form of the exhibit list to be included therein, the numbering
6 of trial exhibits, and immediate communication to the Court of any settlement, remain in
full force and effect.
7
(6)
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
8 record.
9
Dated this 18th day of May, 2023.
Ravi Subramanian
Clerk
10
11
s/Laurie Cuaresma
Deputy Clerk
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?