State of Washington v. Landmark Technology A LLC

Filing 77

ORDER re Parties' 76 Stipulated Motion Re Briefing Schedule on Cross Motions (Dkts. 71 & 73 ). State's Combined Reply and Response Brief due by 5/28/2024, Landmark's Reply Brief due by 6/3/2024. Motions noted for 6/3/2024. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (MJV)

Download PDF
1 The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 13 14 STIPULATED MOTION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CROSS MOTIONS Plaintiff, 11 12 NO. 2:21-cv-00728-RSM STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY A, LLC and RAYMOND MERCADO, individually, NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 2024 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION Pursuant to LCR 7(k), Plaintiff State of Washington (“State”) and Defendants Landmark Technology A, LLC (“Landmark”) and Raymond Mercado (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby agree to the following briefing schedule for the State’s Motion for Ruling Regarding the Applicable Legal Test for Determining Bad Faith (“State’s Motion”), filed on April 18, 2024, and Landmark’s Response in Opposition to State of Washington’s Motion for Ruling Regarding the Applicable Legal Test for Determining Bad Faith and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment Establishing Applicable Legal Test for Noerr-Pennington Immunity (“Landmark’s Motion”), filed on May 6, 2024: STIPULATED MOTION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CROSS MOTIONS – 1 CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00728-RSM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Consumer Protection Division 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104-3188 (206) 464-7744 1 State’s Combined Reply and Response Brief: May 28, 2024 2 Landmark’s Reply Brief: June 3, 2024 3 4 5 The Parties further agree that the Court may hear both the State’s Motion and Landmark’s Motion on June 3, 2024. 6 7 DATED: May 8, 2024 12 /s/ Bob Hyde AARON J. FICKES, WSBA #51584 BEN J. BRYSACZ, WSBA #54683 HEIDI C. ANDERSON, WSBA #37603 ROBERT HYDE, WSBA #33593 MICHAEL HALL, WSBA #19871 Assistant Attorneys General 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 464-7744 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 10 11 14 15 DATED: May 8, 2024 18 /s/ Justin P. Walsh (with permission) JUSTIN P. WALSH, WSBA #40696 Gleam Law, PLLC 605 First Avenue, Suite 330 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 693-2900 19 Attorney for Defendants 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CROSS MOTIONS – 2 CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00728-RSM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Consumer Protection Division 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104-3188 (206) 464-7744 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 DATED this 8th day of May, 2024. 4 A 5 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CROSS MOTIONS – 3 CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00728-RSM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Consumer Protection Division 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104-3188 (206) 464-7744 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing to be served on the following parties via the following methods: 4 5 6 7 Justin P. Walsh Gleam Law, PLLC 605 1st Avenue, Suite 330 Seattle, WA 98104 justin@gleamlaw.com ☐Legal Messenger ☐First-Class Mail, Postage Prepaid ☐Certified Mail, Receipt Requested ☒Email ☒E-Service 8 9 10 I certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct. 11 12 DATED this 8th day of May, 2024, at Seattle, Washington. 13 14 s/ Bob Hyde ROBERT HYDE, WSBA #33593 Assistant Attorney General 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CROSS MOTIONS – 4 CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00728-RSM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Consumer Protection Division 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104-3188 (206) 464-7744

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?