Norris et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND SECOND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re Parties' 26 Stipulated Motion. T-Mobile's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is continued until 14 days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") rules on the pending motion to transfer related cases for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (SR)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-01153-BJR Document 27 Filed 10/06/21 Page 1 of 4 1 THE HONORABLE BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 8 9 RANDALL NORRIS and MISTY NORRIS on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, No. 2:21-cv-1153-BJR STIPULATION AND SECOND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT v. T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant. 13 14 15 Under Western District of Washington Local Rule 7(d)(1) and 10(g), Plaintiffs Randall and 16 Misty Norris and Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc., (together the “Parties”) stipulate that T-Mobile’s 17 deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is continued until 14 days 18 after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) rules on the pending motion to 19 transfer related cases for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. 20 21 See In re T-Mobile Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., MDL Docket No. 3019 (J.P.M.L. filed Aug. 23, 2021) (ECF No. 1). Good cause exists for this extension because the plaintiffs in another case, Daruwalla v. T- 22 23 24 25 26 Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-1118 (W.D. Wash., filed Aug. 19, 2021), filed the transfer motion and identified this case, and numerous others, as related cases that should be transferred. See In re STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER (No. 2:21-cv-1153-BJR) - 1 154135180.1 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 Phone: 206.359.8000 Fax: 206.359.9000 Case 2:21-cv-01153-BJR Document 27 Filed 10/06/21 Page 2 of 4 1 T-Mobile, MDL Docket No. 3019 (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 8-1, 11, 20, 48, 62, 65). The extension will 2 conserve judicial resources by allowing T-Mobile to assess the pending JPML motion, continue 3 discussions with Plaintiffs’ counsel here and counsel in the related cases, and know which district court’s local rules will control this case before responding to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 4 5 Dated: October 5, 2021 6 By: /s/ Steve Y. Koh Steve Y. Koh, WSBA No. 23284 Kathleen M. O’Sullivan, WSBA No. 27850 Lauren J. Tsuji, WSBA No. 55839 PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 E-mail: SKoh@perkinscoie.com KOSullivan@perkinscoie.com LTsuji@perkinscoie.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kristine McAlister Brown (pro hac vice) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 E-mail: kristy.brown@alston.com 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. 17 18 By: /s/ Anne-Marie E. Sargent Anne-Marie E. Sargent CONNOR & SARGENT PLLC 921 Hildebrand Lane NE, Suite 240 Bainbridge Island, Washington 98110 Telephone: (206) 654-5050 E-Mail: aes@cslawfirm.net 19 20 21 22 Gary F. Lynch (pro hac vice) Nicholas A. Colella (pro hac vice) CARLSON LYNCH, LLP 1133 Penn Avenue, 5th Floor 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER (No. 2:21-cv-1153-BJR) - 2 154135180.1 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 Phone: 206.359.8000 Fax: 206.359.9000 Case 2:21-cv-01153-BJR Document 27 Filed 10/06/21 Page 3 of 4 1 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 E-Mail: glynch@carlsonlynch.com ncolella@carlsonlynch.com Telephone: (412) 322-9243 Facsimile: (412) 231-0246 2 3 4 Joseph P. Guglielmo (pro hac vice) Carey Alexander (pro hac vice) SCOTT + SCOTT LLP The Helmsley Building 230 Park Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10169 E-Mail: jguglielmo@scott-scott.com calexander@scott-scott.com 5 6 7 8 Erin Green Comite (pro hac vice) SCOTT + SCOTT LLP LLP 156 South Main Stree PO Box 192 Colchester, CT 06415 860-537-5537 Fax: 860-537-4432 Email: ecomite@scott-scott.com 9 10 11 12 13 Brian C. Gudmudson (pro hac vice forthcoming) ZIMMERMAN REED LLP 1100 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 E-Mail: brian.gudmudson@zimmreed.com 14 15 16 MaryBeth V. Gibson (pro hac vice pending) The Finley Firm, P.C. 3535 Piedmont Road Building 14, Suite 230 Atlanta, GA 30305 E-Mail: mgibson@thefinleyfirm.com 17 18 19 20 22 Arthur M. Murray (pro hac vice forthcoming) MURRAY LAW FIRM 701 Poydras Street New Orleans, LA 70139 E-Mail: amurray@murray-lawfirm.com 23 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER (No. 2:21-cv-1153-BJR) - 3 154135180.1 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 Phone: 206.359.8000 Fax: 206.359.9000 Case 2:21-cv-01153-BJR Document 27 Filed 10/06/21 Page 4 of 4 ORDER 1 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 6th day of October 2021. 4 s/Barbara J. Rothstein Barbara J. Rothstein U.S. District Court Judge 5 6 7 Presented by: 8 /s/ Steve Y. Koh Steve Y. Koh, WSBA No. 23284 Kathleen M. O’Sullivan, WSBA No. 27850 Lauren J. Tsuji, WSBA No. 55839 PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 E-mail: SKoh@perkinscoie.com KOSullivan@perkinscoie.com LTsuji@perkinscoie.com 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Kristine McAlister Brown (pro hac vice) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 E-mail: kristy.brown@alston.com Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER (No. 2:21-cv-1153-BJR) - 4 154135180.1 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 Phone: 206.359.8000 Fax: 206.359.9000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?