Melwani v. Amazon.com Inc et al
Filing
58
ORDER granting Parties' #57 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadline for Response to Second Amended Complaint. Defendant's Response to Amended Complaint or Second Amended Complaint shall be due by 10/17/2022 (21 days after Plaintiff's deadline) or 21 days after any amended complaint is filed, whichever is sooner. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
Case 2:21-cv-01329-RSM Document 58 Filed 09/20/22 Page 1 of 2
1
THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
PRAKASH MELWANI,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. 2:21-cv-01329-RSM
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC.,
13
Defendant.
14
15
Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS that the briefing schedule
16
outlined in the below table shall be set in this action for Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s
17
Amended Complaint or Second Amended Complaint.
18
BRIEFING
PROPOSED DEADLINE
Defendant’s Response to Amended Complaint
or Second Amended Complaint
October 17, 2022 (21 days
after Plaintiff’s deadline) or
21 days after any amended
complaint is filed,
whichever is sooner
19
20
21
22
23
DATED this 20th day of September, 2022.
A
24
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
(No. 2:21-cv-01329-RSM) – 1
158215692
Case 2:21-cv-01329-RSM Document 58 Filed 09/20/22 Page 2 of 2
1
Presented by:
2
s/ Eric J. Weiss
Eric J. Weiss, WSBA No. 44807
3
4
5
6
Perkins Coie LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: 206.359.8000
Facsimile: 206.359.9000
E-mail: EWeiss@perkinscoie.com
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
(No. 2:21-cv-01329-RSM) – 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?