Melwani v. Amazon.com Inc et al

Filing 58

ORDER granting Parties' 57 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadline for Response to Second Amended Complaint. Defendant's Response to Amended Complaint or Second Amended Complaint shall be due by 10/17/2022 (21 days after Plaintiff's deadline) or 21 days after any amended complaint is filed, whichever is sooner. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-01329-RSM Document 58 Filed 09/20/22 Page 1 of 2 1 THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 PRAKASH MELWANI, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 No. 2:21-cv-01329-RSM ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v. AMAZON.COM, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 15 Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS that the briefing schedule 16 outlined in the below table shall be set in this action for Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s 17 Amended Complaint or Second Amended Complaint. 18 BRIEFING PROPOSED DEADLINE Defendant’s Response to Amended Complaint or Second Amended Complaint October 17, 2022 (21 days after Plaintiff’s deadline) or 21 days after any amended complaint is filed, whichever is sooner 19 20 21 22 23 DATED this 20th day of September, 2022. A 24 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (No. 2:21-cv-01329-RSM) – 1 158215692 Case 2:21-cv-01329-RSM Document 58 Filed 09/20/22 Page 2 of 2 1 Presented by: 2 s/ Eric J. Weiss Eric J. Weiss, WSBA No. 44807 3 4 5 6 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 E-mail: EWeiss@perkinscoie.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (No. 2:21-cv-01329-RSM) – 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?