Kairu v. United States of America

Filing 15

ORDER granting Parties' 14 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Pretrial Deadlines. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 12/28/2022, Discovery completed by 2/28/2023, Dispositive motions due by 3/28/2023. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (SB)

Download PDF
The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 LUCY W. KAIRU, Case No. 2:22-cv-00154-BJR Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 13 JOINT STIPULATION 14 15 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES The parties hereby jointly STIPULATE AND AGREE to extend the following trial date 16 and related dates as set forth in the Court’s June 30, 2022 Order Setting Trial Date and Related 17 Dates (Dkt. 12), as set forth below. 18 19 20 21 22 23 Deadline Current Deadline Proposed New Deadline Reports from expert witness under FRCP 26(a)(2) due November 28, 2022 December 28, 2022 Discovery completed by December 28, 2022 February 28, 2023 January 27, 2023 March 28, 2023 All dispositive motions must be filed by Good cause exists for extending these specific deadlines. Although the parties have 24 conducted extensive fact discovery to date, including exchanging written discovery, setting and STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES [2:22-cv-00154-BJR] - 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 Seattle, Washington 98101-1271 206-553-7970 1 taking depositions, and collecting thousands of pages of medical records, the parties need 2 additional time before expert witnesses can be disclosed. Due to holiday schedules, the timing of 3 when new medical records were received from medical facilities, and the significant volume of 4 records, the parties’ experts need additional time to review records and prepare their expert reports. 5 The parties anticipate that an additional month will be sufficient for their experts to finalize their 6 reports. The parties reasonably anticipate that rebuttal experts will be named and an extension of 7 the close of discovery by two months will allow the parties time to depose any rebuttal experts 8 prior to the close of discovery. 9 For the reasons set forth above, the parties believe that there is good cause to request an 10 extension of the above-listed trial date and related dates and respectfully request that the Court 11 grant their motion. 12 SO STIPULATED. 13 Dated this 15th day of November, 2022. 14 15 16 17 NICHOLAS W. BROWN United States Attorney CMG LAW s/ Whitney Passmore WHITNEY PASSMORE, FL No. 91922 s/ Tyler Goldberg-Hoss TYLER GOLDBERG-HOSS, WSBA No. 41653 115 NE 100th Street, Ste. 220 Seattle, WA 98125 Phone: 206-443-8600 Email: tyler@cmglaw.com 22 s/ Nickolas Bohl NICKOLAS BOHL, WSBA No. 48978 Assistant United States Attorneys United States Attorney’s Office 700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 Seattle, Washington 98101-1271 Phone: 206-553-7970 Fax: 206-553-4067 Email: whitney.passmore@usdoj.gov Email: nickolas.bohl@usdoj.gov 23 Attorneys for United States of America 18 19 20 21 Attorney for Plaintiff 24 STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES [2:22-cv-00154-BJR] - 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 Seattle, Washington 98101-1271 206-553-7970 ORDER 1 2 It is hereby ORDERED that the parties’ motion is GRANTED. The new pretrial deadlines 3 are as follows: 4 5 6 7 8 Deadlines Reports from expert witness under FRCP 26(a)(2) due December 28, 2022 Discovery completed by February 28, 2023 All dispositive motions must be filed by March 28, 2023 9 10 DATED this 18th day of November, 2022. 11 A 12 Barbara Jacobs Rothstein U.S. District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES [2:22-cv-00154-BJR] - 3 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 Seattle, Washington 98101-1271 206-553-7970

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?