Kairu v. United States of America
Filing
15
ORDER granting Parties' 14 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Pretrial Deadlines. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 12/28/2022, Discovery completed by 2/28/2023, Dispositive motions due by 3/28/2023. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (SB)
The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
LUCY W. KAIRU,
Case No. 2:22-cv-00154-BJR
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
13
JOINT STIPULATION
14
15
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL
DEADLINES
The parties hereby jointly STIPULATE AND AGREE to extend the following trial date
16 and related dates as set forth in the Court’s June 30, 2022 Order Setting Trial Date and Related
17 Dates (Dkt. 12), as set forth below.
18
19
20
21
22
23
Deadline
Current Deadline
Proposed New Deadline
Reports from expert witness under
FRCP 26(a)(2) due
November 28, 2022
December 28, 2022
Discovery completed by
December 28, 2022
February 28, 2023
January 27, 2023
March 28, 2023
All dispositive motions must be filed by
Good cause exists for extending these specific deadlines. Although the parties have
24 conducted extensive fact discovery to date, including exchanging written discovery, setting and
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES
[2:22-cv-00154-BJR] - 1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
206-553-7970
1 taking depositions, and collecting thousands of pages of medical records, the parties need
2 additional time before expert witnesses can be disclosed. Due to holiday schedules, the timing of
3 when new medical records were received from medical facilities, and the significant volume of
4 records, the parties’ experts need additional time to review records and prepare their expert reports.
5 The parties anticipate that an additional month will be sufficient for their experts to finalize their
6 reports. The parties reasonably anticipate that rebuttal experts will be named and an extension of
7 the close of discovery by two months will allow the parties time to depose any rebuttal experts
8 prior to the close of discovery.
9
For the reasons set forth above, the parties believe that there is good cause to request an
10 extension of the above-listed trial date and related dates and respectfully request that the Court
11 grant their motion.
12
SO STIPULATED.
13
Dated this 15th day of November, 2022.
14
15
16
17
NICHOLAS W. BROWN
United States Attorney
CMG LAW
s/ Whitney Passmore
WHITNEY PASSMORE, FL No. 91922
s/ Tyler Goldberg-Hoss
TYLER GOLDBERG-HOSS, WSBA No. 41653
115 NE 100th Street, Ste. 220
Seattle, WA 98125
Phone: 206-443-8600
Email: tyler@cmglaw.com
22
s/ Nickolas Bohl
NICKOLAS BOHL, WSBA No. 48978
Assistant United States Attorneys
United States Attorney’s Office
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
Phone: 206-553-7970
Fax: 206-553-4067
Email: whitney.passmore@usdoj.gov
Email: nickolas.bohl@usdoj.gov
23
Attorneys for United States of America
18
19
20
21
Attorney for Plaintiff
24
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES
[2:22-cv-00154-BJR] - 2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
206-553-7970
ORDER
1
2
It is hereby ORDERED that the parties’ motion is GRANTED. The new pretrial deadlines
3 are as follows:
4
5
6
7
8
Deadlines
Reports from expert witness under FRCP 26(a)(2) due
December 28, 2022
Discovery completed by
February 28, 2023
All dispositive motions must be filed by
March 28, 2023
9
10
DATED this 18th day of November, 2022.
11
A
12
Barbara Jacobs Rothstein
U.S. District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES
[2:22-cv-00154-BJR] - 3
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
206-553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?