United States of America et al v. Cherokee General Corporation et al
ORDER denying Parties' 45 Stipulated Motion for a Protective Order without prejudice, subject to re-filing in compliance with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2). Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
CASE NO. C22-0299-KKE
ORDER DENYING STIPULATED
MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
CHEROKEE GENERAL CORPORATION,
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ submission of a stipulated protective
order. Dkt. No. 45. The motion does not comply with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2), which requires
that if parties file a proposed stipulated protective order that departs from this district’s model
protective order, they “must provide the court with a redlined version identifying departures from
the model.” The parties’ motion (Dkt. No. 45) is therefore DENIED without prejudice, subject to
re-filing in compliance with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2).
Dated this 13th day of November, 2023.
Kymberly K. Evanson
United States District Judge
ORDER - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?