United States of America et al v. Cherokee General Corporation et al

Filing 46

ORDER denying Parties' 45 Stipulated Motion for a Protective Order without prejudice, subject to re-filing in compliance with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2). Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. CASE NO. C22-0299-KKE Plaintiff(s), ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CHEROKEE GENERAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendant(s). 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ submission of a stipulated protective 14 order. Dkt. No. 45. The motion does not comply with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2), which requires 15 that if parties file a proposed stipulated protective order that departs from this district’s model 16 protective order, they “must provide the court with a redlined version identifying departures from 17 the model.” The parties’ motion (Dkt. No. 45) is therefore DENIED without prejudice, subject to 18 re-filing in compliance with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2). 19 Dated this 13th day of November, 2023. 20 A 21 Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge 22 23 24 ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?