Sixty-01 Association of Apartment Owners v. Public Service Insurance Company et al

Filing 268

MINUTE ORDER: On 1/6/2025, Plaintiff moved to compel production (Dkt. No. 252 ). In response, Defendant Public Service Insurance Company ("PSIC") indicates that it has produced all responsive non-privileged material, at least as it relate s to its experts' files and that will serve a supplemental privilege log in the near future regarding the same. (See Dkt. No. 264 at 1.) In reply, Plaintiff points to what it describes as responsive PSIC claims manuals, along with internal PSI C communications, both which PSIC did not produce or address. (See Dkt. No. 266 at 35.) Plaintiff also suggests that, while PSIC recently produced some experts' files, it inappropriately withheld certain presentations from PSIC's claim-ha ndling expert GailAnn Stargardter. (Id. at 6.) The Court seeks supplemental briefing from PSIC regarding why it need not produce these items. That briefing shall be limited to six pages and is due no later than 1/29/2025. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (KRA)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 SIXTY-01 ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS, v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. C22-1373-JCC MINUTE ORDER PUBLIC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge: On January 6, 2025, Plaintiff moved to compel production (Dkt. No. 252). In response, 19 Defendant Public Service Insurance Company (“PSIC”) indicates that it has produced all 20 responsive non-privileged material, at least as it relates to its experts’ files and that will serve a 21 supplemental privilege log in the near future regarding the same. (See Dkt. No. 264 at 1.) In 22 reply, Plaintiff points to what it describes as responsive PSIC claims manuals, along with internal 23 PSIC communications, both which PSIC did not produce or address. (See Dkt. No. 266 at 3–5.) 24 Plaintiff also suggests that, while PSIC recently produced some experts’ files, it inappropriately 25 withheld certain presentations from PSIC’s claim-handling expert GailAnn Stargardter. (Id. at 6.) 26 The Court seeks supplemental briefing from PSIC regarding why it need not produce MINUTE ORDER C22-1373-JCC PAGE - 1 1 these items. That briefing shall be limited to six pages and is due no later than January 29, 2025. 2 3 DATED this 27th day of January 2025. 4 Ravi Subramanian Clerk of Court 5 s/Kathleen Albert Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MINUTE ORDER C22-1373-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?