Vague v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 28

ORDER Amending the Scheduling Order. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 11/20/2023, to file the optional Reply Brief. No further extensions of time to file the optional Reply Brief will be granted. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 SHAWN VAGUE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Case No. C22-1684 RSM ORDER AMENDING THE SCHEDULING ORDER Defendant. 12 13 Based on Plaintiff’s motion to amend the scheduling order, and that Defendant’s Counsel 14 has no opposition, it is hereby ORDERED that the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 11) shall be amended 15 as follows: Plaintiff shall have up to and including November 20, 2023, to file the optional 16 Reply Brief. The Court notes Plaintiff has requested to amend the Scheduling Order multiple 17 times, and this instant request for additional time was due to “a personal request and need.” Dkt. 18 27 at 1. The Court makes great efforts to ensure that social security cases are resolved in a 19 timely fashion. No further extensions of time to file the optional Reply Brief will be granted. 20 DATED this 14th day of November, 2023. A 21 22 Ricardo S. Martinez United States District Judge 23 ORDER AMENDING THE SCHEDULING ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?