McGlown v. United States Department of Commerce et al

Filing 4

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)

Download PDF
Case 2:23-cv-00049-TL Document 4 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 MEREDITH MCGLOWN, 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., Case No. C23-0049-TL ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the 17 above-entitled action. Dkt. 1. Because Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to 18 afford the $402 filing fee, Plaintiff financially qualifies for IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 1915(a)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff’s IFP application, Dkt. 1, is GRANTED. However, the 20 undersigned recommends review by the assigned District Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915(e)(2)(B). See, e.g., McGlown v. Melburg Financial Group, Inc., C19-0029-RSL; McGlown 22 v. State of Washington, C19-1658-RSM; McGlown v. Department of Homeland Security, No. 23 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION - 1 Case 2:23-cv-00049-TL Document 4 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2 1 C18-1403-RSM; McGlown v. Melburg Financial Group, Inc., No. C17-0815-RAJ. The Clerk is 2 directed to send copies of this order to Plaintiff and to the Honorable Tana Lin. 3 Dated this 17th day of January, 2023. 4 A 5 S. KATE VAUGHAN United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?