Comair Limited v. The Boeing Company et al

Filing 82

ORDER granting Parties' 81 Stipulated MOTION to Revise Case Schedule. 5-14 day Jury Trial is set for 2/10/2025 before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Discovery Motions due by 9/2/2024, Dispositive motions due by 11/6/2024, Discovery completed by 11 /18/2024, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 12/20/2024, Motions in Limine due by 1/13/2025, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 1/10/2025, Trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, jury instructions, neutral statement of the case, and trial exhibits due by 1/30/2025. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Download PDF
1 THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 COMAIR LIMITED, Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 12 No. 2:23-cv-00176-RSM THE BOEING COMPANY, Defendant. 13 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: JULY 2, 2024 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Comair Limited (“Comair”) and Defendant The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) have been meeting and conferring to implement the Court’s June 21, 2024 order related to discovery matters in this case. ECF 80. The parties accordingly stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 10(g) and Local Rule 7(d)(1), to a revised case schedule to allow additional time to conduct discovery. The parties jointly request that the Court enter an order modifying the schedule as follows: 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE Case 2:23-cv-00176-RSM 1 Current Dates 2 JURY TRIAL DATE 3 Length of Trial 4 Deadline for filing motions related to discovery. Any such motions shall be noted for consideration pursuant to LCR 7(d)(3) Discovery completed by 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 November 11, 2024 February 10, 2025 5-14 days All dispositive motions must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the fourth Friday thereafter (See LCR 7(d)) Mediation per LCR 39.1(c)(3), if requested by the parties, held no later than All motions in limine must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the THIRD Friday thereafter Agreed pretrial order due Pretrial conference to be scheduled by the Court Trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, jury instructions, neutral statement of the case, and trial exhibits due 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE Case No. 2:23-cv-00176-RSM New Dates -2- June 25, 2024 September 2, 2024 July 8, 2024 November 18, 2024 August 6, 2024 November 6, 2024 September 20, 2024 December 20, 2024 October 11, 2024 January 13, 2025 October 23, 2024 January 10, 2025 October 30, 2024 January 30, 2025 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DATED: July 2, 2024 By: s/ Kristy Schlesinger Hunter K. Ahern WA Bar No. 54489 Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6800 Seattle, WA 98104-7066 Telephone: (206) 344-7600 Facsimile: (206) 344-3113 hahern@shb.com By: s/ Michael B Slade Michael B. Slade (admitted pro hac vice) Casey McGushin (admitted pro hac vice) Kirkland & Ellis LLP 333 W. Wolf Point Plaza Chicago, IL 60654 michael.slade@kirland.com casey.mcgushin@kirkland.com Marc P. Miles (admitted pro hac vice) Kristy A. Schlesinger (admitted pro hac vice) 5 Park Plaza Suite 1600 Irvine, California 92614 Telephone: (949) 475-1500 Facsimile: (949) 475-0016 mmiles@shb.com kschlesinger@shb.com By: s/ Ulrike B. Connelly Ulrike B. Connelly, Bar No. 42478 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 UConnelly@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Comair Limited Attorneys for Defendant The Boeing Company 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER Based upon the foregoing Stipulation, the Court hereby modifies the case schedule as set forth herein. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 8th day of July, 2024. 21 A 22 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE Case No. 2:23-cv-00176-RSM -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?