Fawcett v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Filing
55
ORDER granting Parties' 54 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss. This matter is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party. Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)
1
HONORABLE JUDGE KYMBERLY K. EVANSON
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
9
10
11
ASHLEY FAWCETT,
v.
No. 2:23-cv-00248-KKE
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY d/b/a TRAVELERS
INSURANCE,
Defendant.
12
13
I.
STIPULATION
14
Plaintiff Ashley Fawcett and Defendant The Standard Fire Insurance Company hereby
15
stipulate and agree that this case and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant shall be dismissed with
16
prejudice and without fees or costs or further recovery pursuant to Civil Rule 41(a)(l)(A).
17
DATED this 21st day of November 2024.
18
LETHER LAW GROUP
19
/s/ Ryan Bisel
Thomas Lether, WSBA #18089
Kevin J. Kay, WSBA #34546
Ryan Bisel, WSBA #58634
1848 Westlake Avenue N, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98109
tlether@letherlaw.com
kkay@letherlaw.com
rbisel@letherlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
20
21
22
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL – 1
(2:23-cv-00248-KKE)
RUSH, HANNULA, HARKINS & KYLER,
PLLC
/s/ Benjamin T. Zielinski
Vernon W. Harkins, WSBA #6689
Benjamin T. Zielinski, WSBA #43670
4701 South 19th Street, Suite 300
Tacoma, WA 98405
(253)-383-5388
vharkins@rhhk.com
bzielinski@rhhk.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
1
II.
2
3
4
5
6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The parties’ stipulated motion for dismissal (Dkt. No. 54) is GRANTED. It is hereby
ORDERED that the above-entitled matter is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any
party.
Dated this 22nd day of November, 2024.
7
A
8
9
Kymberly K. Evanson
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL – 2
(2:23-cv-00248-KKE)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?