Fawcett v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company

Filing 55

ORDER granting Parties' 54 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss. This matter is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party. Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE JUDGE KYMBERLY K. EVANSON 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 ASHLEY FAWCETT, v. No. 2:23-cv-00248-KKE Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a TRAVELERS INSURANCE, Defendant. 12 13 I. STIPULATION 14 Plaintiff Ashley Fawcett and Defendant The Standard Fire Insurance Company hereby 15 stipulate and agree that this case and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant shall be dismissed with 16 prejudice and without fees or costs or further recovery pursuant to Civil Rule 41(a)(l)(A). 17 DATED this 21st day of November 2024. 18 LETHER LAW GROUP 19 /s/ Ryan Bisel Thomas Lether, WSBA #18089 Kevin J. Kay, WSBA #34546 Ryan Bisel, WSBA #58634 1848 Westlake Avenue N, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 tlether@letherlaw.com kkay@letherlaw.com rbisel@letherlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant 20 21 22 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL – 1 (2:23-cv-00248-KKE) RUSH, HANNULA, HARKINS & KYLER, PLLC /s/ Benjamin T. Zielinski Vernon W. Harkins, WSBA #6689 Benjamin T. Zielinski, WSBA #43670 4701 South 19th Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98405 (253)-383-5388 vharkins@rhhk.com bzielinski@rhhk.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 II. 2 3 4 5 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties’ stipulated motion for dismissal (Dkt. No. 54) is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that the above-entitled matter is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party. Dated this 22nd day of November, 2024. 7 A 8 9 Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL – 2 (2:23-cv-00248-KKE)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?