Amazon.com Inc et al v. Ali et al
Filing
30
ORDER granting Defendant's 29 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant Ali's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 9/18/2024. Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
11
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and AMAZON.COM
SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company; AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES,
INC., a Nevada corporation,
12
Plaintiffs,
9
10
13
14
15
16
Case No. 2:23-cv-01062-KKE
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT
v.
ASHRAF ALI, an individual; and DOES 110, d/b/a “thefunnelguru.com” and
“reinstatedpros.com,”
Defendants.
17
This matter came before the Court on Defendant Ashraf Ali’s Unopposed Motion for an
18
Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. The Court reviewed the motion and considered
19
the files and records herein.
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to
21
Respond to the Complaint (Dkt. No. 29) is GRANTED. Defendant Ali’s deadline to answer or
22
otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to September 18, 2024.
23
24
25
26
DATED: August 28, 2024
A
Kymberly K. Evanson
United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT - 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Presented by:
THOMAS P. HOWARD, LLC
Scott E. Brenner (Pro Hac Vic)
Thomas P. Howard (Pro Hac Vic)
842 W. South Boulder Rd., Suite 100
Louisville, CO 80027
303-665-9845
sbrenner@thowardlaw.com
Attorney for Defendant Ashraf Ali
LAW OFFICE OF CARL J. MARQUARDT PLLC
Carl J. Marquardt (WA Bar No. 23257)
1126 34th Avenue, Suite 311
Seattle, WA 98122
Tel: (206) 388-4498
Email: carl@cjmlawoffice.com
Local Attorney for Defendant Ashraf Ali
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?