Benshoof v. Admon et al

Filing 42

MINUTE ORDER: Defendant City of Seattle moved to stay the initial scheduling deadlines set by the Court on 10/11/2023. Dkt. No. 34 . The City argues good cause exists to stay the initial deadlines because the Court "has not yet completed its re view under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)" and "has not issued summonses." Plaintiff Kurt Benshoof opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 35 . After the City moved to stay, the Court completed its 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) review and ordered Ben shoof to file an amended complaint within 21 days. Dkt. No. 38 at 6-13, 16. The Court agrees good cause exists to stay the initial deadlines until Benshoof files an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the initial scheduling deadlines set forth in its Minute Order dated 10/11/2023. Within fourteen days of Benshoof filing an amended complaint, the Court will issue a new order setting initial scheduling deadlines. Authorized by Judge Jamal N Whitehead. (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 KURT BENSHOOF, Plaintiff, v. MOSHE ADMON, DANIEL AUDERER, JUSTIN BOOKER, FREYA BRIER, CITY OF SEATTLE, NATHAN CLIBER, ZACHARY COOK, BENJAMIN COOMER, ANITA CRAWFORD-WILLIS, JENNY DURKAN, JAMES ERVIN, DAVID ESTUDILLO, MARSHALL FERGUSON, MICHAEL FOX, COREY FOY, AMY FRANKLIN-BIHARY, WILLIAM GATES, III, STEVEN GONZALEZ, TYLER GOSLIN, WILLIE GREGORY, OWEN HERMSEN, JAY INSLEE, DAVID KEENAN, GABRIEL LADD, DANIEL LENTZ, MAGALIE LERMAN, MARY LYNCH, SARAH MACDONALD, ANTHONY MARINELLA, RICARDO MARTINEZ, BRADLEY MOORE, KATRINA OUTLAND, JESSICA OWEN, PCC NATURAL MARKETS, KYLE REKOFKE, STEVEN ROSEN, BLAIR RUSS, UMAIR SHAH, SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET, MICHAEL THURSTON, JARED WALLACE, and SANDRA WIDLAN, MINUTE ORDER - 1 CASE NO. 2:23-cv-1392 MINUTE ORDER Defendant. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Jamal N. Whitehead, United States District Judge: Defendant City of Seattle moved to stay the initial scheduling deadlines set by the Court on October 11, 2023. Dkt. No. 34. The City argues good cause exists to stay the initial deadlines because the Court “has not yet completed its review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)” and “has not issued summonses.” Id. at 2. Plaintiff Kurt Benshoof opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 35. After the City moved to stay, the Court completed its 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) review and ordered Benshoof to file an amended complaint within 21 days. Dkt. No. 38 at 6-13, 16. The Court agrees good cause exists to stay the initial deadlines until Benshoof files an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the initial scheduling deadlines set forth in its Minute Order dated October 11, 2023. Within fourteen days of Benshoof filing an amended complaint, the Court will issue a new order setting initial scheduling deadlines. Dated this 14th day of November 2023. Ravi Subramanian 18 Clerk 19 /s/Serge Bodnarchuk Deputy Clerk 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?