Benshoof v. Admon et al
Filing
42
MINUTE ORDER: Defendant City of Seattle moved to stay the initial scheduling deadlines set by the Court on 10/11/2023. Dkt. No. 34 . The City argues good cause exists to stay the initial deadlines because the Court "has not yet completed its re view under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)" and "has not issued summonses." Plaintiff Kurt Benshoof opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 35 . After the City moved to stay, the Court completed its 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) review and ordered Ben shoof to file an amended complaint within 21 days. Dkt. No. 38 at 6-13, 16. The Court agrees good cause exists to stay the initial deadlines until Benshoof files an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the initial scheduling deadlines set forth in its Minute Order dated 10/11/2023. Within fourteen days of Benshoof filing an amended complaint, the Court will issue a new order setting initial scheduling deadlines. Authorized by Judge Jamal N Whitehead. (SB)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
KURT BENSHOOF,
Plaintiff,
v.
MOSHE ADMON, DANIEL
AUDERER, JUSTIN BOOKER, FREYA
BRIER, CITY OF SEATTLE, NATHAN
CLIBER, ZACHARY COOK,
BENJAMIN COOMER, ANITA
CRAWFORD-WILLIS, JENNY
DURKAN, JAMES ERVIN, DAVID
ESTUDILLO, MARSHALL
FERGUSON, MICHAEL FOX, COREY
FOY, AMY FRANKLIN-BIHARY,
WILLIAM GATES, III, STEVEN
GONZALEZ, TYLER GOSLIN, WILLIE
GREGORY, OWEN HERMSEN, JAY
INSLEE, DAVID KEENAN, GABRIEL
LADD, DANIEL LENTZ, MAGALIE
LERMAN, MARY LYNCH, SARAH
MACDONALD, ANTHONY
MARINELLA, RICARDO MARTINEZ,
BRADLEY MOORE, KATRINA
OUTLAND, JESSICA OWEN, PCC
NATURAL MARKETS, KYLE
REKOFKE, STEVEN ROSEN, BLAIR
RUSS, UMAIR SHAH, SPROUTS
FARMERS MARKET, MICHAEL
THURSTON, JARED WALLACE, and
SANDRA WIDLAN,
MINUTE ORDER - 1
CASE NO. 2:23-cv-1392
MINUTE ORDER
Defendant.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Jamal N. Whitehead, United States District Judge:
Defendant City of Seattle moved to stay the initial scheduling deadlines set
by the Court on October 11, 2023. Dkt. No. 34. The City argues good cause exists to
stay the initial deadlines because the Court “has not yet completed its review under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)” and “has not issued summonses.” Id. at 2. Plaintiff Kurt
Benshoof opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 35.
After the City moved to stay, the Court completed its 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)
review and ordered Benshoof to file an amended complaint within 21 days. Dkt. No.
38 at 6-13, 16. The Court agrees good cause exists to stay the initial deadlines until
Benshoof files an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the initial
scheduling deadlines set forth in its Minute Order dated October 11, 2023. Within
fourteen days of Benshoof filing an amended complaint, the Court will issue a new
order setting initial scheduling deadlines.
Dated this 14th day of November 2023.
Ravi Subramanian
18
Clerk
19
/s/Serge Bodnarchuk
Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?