Fitzgerald v. The Shade Store LLC
Filing
40
ORDER granting Parties' 39 Stipulated MOTION to Set Case Schedule. Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan due by 6/7/2024, FRCP 16(b) Conference to be set by the Court, Deadline to move for leave to amend the pleadings is 9/2/2024, Close of fa ct discovery for issues related to class certification is 10/10/2024, Expert Reports on class certification due by 11/1/2024, Rebuttal Expert Reports on class certification due by 11/29/2024, Close of expert discovery for issues related to class certification is 12/13/2024, Deadline to file motion for class certification is 12/20/2024. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
1
THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LEE FITZGERALD, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:23-CV-01435-RSM
ORDER GRANTING STIPLUATED
MOTION TO SET CASE SCHEDULE
v.
THE SHADE STORE, LLC,
Defendant.
The Court, having considered the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Set Case Schedule dated
16
May 22, 2024, hereby GRANTS the Stipulated Motion and enters the following schedule for this
17
matter through class certification:
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Case Event
Deadline
FRCP 26(f) Conference
Completed
Exchange of Initial Disclosures
May 31, 2024
Joint Status Report and Discovery
Plan
June 7, 2024
FRCP 16(b) Conference
To be set by the Court
Deadline to move for leave to
amend the pleadings
Close of fact discovery for issues
related to class certification
Expert reports on class
certification issues on which party
has burden
ORDER GRANTING STIPLUATED
MOTION TO SET CASE SCHEDULE - 1
(CASE NO. 2:23-CV-01435-RSM)
September 2, 2024
October 18, 2024
November 1, 2024
STOEL RIVES LLP
123401368.1 0082479-00001
ATTORNEYS
600 University Street, Suite 3600, Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone 206.624.0900
1
6
Rebuttal expert reports on class
certification issues
Close of expert discovery for
issues related to class certification
Deadline to file motion for class
certification
Opposition to motion for class
certification and any Daubert
motions
Reply to motion for class
certification
7
Opposition any Daubert motions
February 18, 2025
8
Reply to Daubert motions
March 4, 2025
2
3
4
5
November 29, 2024
December 13, 2024
December 20, 2024
January 28, 2025
February 18, 2025
9
A hearing on Plaintiff’s anticipated motion for class certification shall be set by the Court
10
following the close of the Parties’ briefing should the Court determine to hold a hearing pursuant
11
to LCR 7(b)(2)(4).
12
A schedule addressing any remaining deadlines for the close of merits fact discovery,
13
dispositive motions, pretrial conference, and any trial shall be set by the Court, if needed, following
14
the Court’s decision on class certification.
15
DATED this 3rd day of June, 2024.
16
A
17
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING STIPLUATED
MOTION TO SET CASE SCHEDULE - 2
(CASE NO. 2:23-CV-01435-RSM)
STOEL RIVES LLP
123401368.1 0082479-00001
ATTORNEYS
600 University Street, Suite 3600, Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone 206.624.0900
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Presented by:
STOEL RIVES LLP
/s/ Jenna M. Poligo
Maren R. Norton, WSBA No. 35435
maren.norton@stoel.com
James M. Shore, WSBA No. 28095
jim.shore@stoel.com
Jenna M. Poligo, WSBA No. 54466
jenna.poligo@stoel.com
600 University Street, Suite 3600
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: 206.624.0900
Facsimile: 206.386.7500
9
10
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
11
Steven N. Feldman, pro hac vice
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 100
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: 213.485.1234
steve.feldman@lw.com
12
13
14
15
16
Shlomo Fellig, pro hac vice
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone: 617.880.4636
shlomo.fellig@lw.com
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING STIPLUATED
MOTION TO SET CASE SCHEDULE - 3
(CASE NO. 2:23-CV-01435-RSM)
STOEL RIVES LLP
123401368.1 0082479-00001
ATTORNEYS
600 University Street, Suite 3600, Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone 206.624.0900
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?