Levy v. Google LLC
Filing
9
ORDER granting Defendant's #5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (SB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
GARY LEVY, an individual,
Case No. 2:23-cv-01678-BJR
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE LLC, a California company,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
This matter came before the Court on Defendant Google LLC’s Unopposed Motion for
Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint, and the Court, having considered the motion
and all evidence submitted in opposition to and in support of the motion, and the pleadings,
records and files herein, it is now therefore:
ORDERED that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
to Complaint is GRANTED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT - 1
Case No. 2:23-cv-01678-BJR
MILLER NASH LLP
AT T O RNE Y S AT L AW
T : 206. 624. 830 0 | F: 206. 34 0. 959 9
605 5T H AVE S, ST E 900
SE AT T LE , WASHI NG T ON 98104
1
DATED this 9th day of November 2023.
2
3
A
4
5
Barbara Jacobs Rothstein
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
Presented by:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
s/April Upchurch Fredrickson
April Upchurch Fredrickson, WSBA No. 31910
april.fredrickson@millernash.com
MILLER NASH LLP
605 5th Ave S, Ste 900
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: (206) 624-8300
Facsimilie: (206) 340-9599
Attorneys for Defendant Google LLC
18
19
20
4863-4859-6366.1
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT - 2
Case No. 2:23-cv-01678-BJR
MILLER NASH LLP
AT T ORNE Y S AT L AW
T : 206. 624. 830 0 | F: 206. 34 0. 959 9
605 5T H AVE S, ST E 900
SE AT T LE , WASHI NG T ON 98104
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?