Davis v. United Services Automobile Association et al

Filing 18

ORDER: Mr. Davis has neither provided updated contact information nor responded to the court's order to show cause. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

KEISHMOND J. DAVIS,

11

v.

12
13
14

ORDER

UNITED SERVICES
AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, et
al.,
Defendants.

15
16

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. C23-1838JLR

On April 23, 2024, the court ordered pro se Plaintiff Keishmond J. Davis to,

17

within ten (10) days of the court’s order: (1) provide updated contact information

18

pursuant to Local Civil Rule 41(b)(2), and (2) show cause why this action should not be

19

dismissed for failure to serve Defendants 1 with a summons and copy of the complaint

20

within the time limitations set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (4/23/24

21
22

1

Defendants are United Services Automobile Association, Charles Hatfield, Steven
Shunk, Marianne Raymer, and Ayanna Cato.
ORDER - 1

1

Order (Dkt. # 16) at 2); see also Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 41(b)(2); Fed. R. Civ. P.

2

4(m). The court warned Mr. Davis that if he “fail[ed] to provide updated contact

3

information and/or [did] not demonstrate good cause for the failure to comply with Rule

4

4(m), the court [would] dismiss the action without prejudice.” (Id.)

5

Over ten days have passed, and Mr. Davis has neither provided updated contact

6

information nor responded to the court’s order to show cause. (See generally Dkt.)

7

Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this action without prejudice.

8

Dated this 8th day of May, 2024.

9

A

JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2