The Upper Deck Company v. Miller et al

Filing 73

ORDER denying Parties' 70 Stipulated Motion for a Protective Order without prejudice, subject to re-filing in compliance with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2). Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, v. CASE NO. C23-1936-KKE Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION RYAN MILLER et al., Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order. Dkt. No. 70. The motion does not comply with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2), which requires that if parties file a proposed stipulated protective order that departs from this district’s model protective order, they “must provide the court with a redlined version identifying departures from the model.” The parties’ motion (Dkt. No. 70) is therefore DENIED without prejudice, subject to re-filing in compliance with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2). Dated this 22nd day of November, 2024. A 20 21 Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge 22 23 24 ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?