The Upper Deck Company v. Miller et al

Filing 73

ORDER denying Parties' 70 Stipulated Motion for a Protective Order without prejudice, subject to re-filing in compliance with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2). Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

THE UPPER DECK COMPANY,
v.

CASE NO. C23-1936-KKE

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING STIPULATED
MOTION

RYAN MILLER et al.,
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order.
Dkt. No. 70. The motion does not comply with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2), which requires that if
parties file a proposed stipulated protective order that departs from this district’s model protective
order, they “must provide the court with a redlined version identifying departures from the model.”
The parties’ motion (Dkt. No. 70) is therefore DENIED without prejudice, subject to re-filing in
compliance with Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2).
Dated this 22nd day of November, 2024.

A

20
21

Kymberly K. Evanson
United States District Judge

22
23
24
ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION - 1