Gargar v. Thompson
Filing
13
ORDER denying Petitioner's #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold.(MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
ABDULKADIR OSMAN GARGAR,
11
12
13
v.
Petitioner,
CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00128-TMC-GJL
ORDER DENYING COUNSEL
MARK THOMPSON,
Respondent.
14
15
The District Court has referred this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action to United States Magistrate
16
Judge Grady J. Leupold. Presently before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel.
17
Dkt. 10.
18
There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254,
19
unless an evidentiary hearing is required or such appointment is “necessary for the effective
20
utilization of discovery procedures.” See McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991); United
21
States v. Duarte-Higareda, 68 F.3d 369, 370 (9th Cir. 1995); United States v. Angelone, 894
22
F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 1990); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983); Rules
23
Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts 6(a) and 8(c). The Court also
24
ORDER DENYING COUNSEL - 1
1
may appoint counsel “at any stage of the case if the interest of justice so requires.” Weygandt,
2
718 F.2d at 954. In deciding whether to appoint counsel, however, the Court “must evaluate the
3
likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims
4
pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Id.
5
Petitioner has not demonstrated the circumstances required for the Court to appoint
6
counsel. As explained in the Court’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 12), Petitioner is not
7
likely to succeed on the merits and an evidentiary hearing is not warranted in this case. Id.
8
Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. 10) is DENIED.
9
Dated this 27th day of March, 2024.
10
A
11
Grady J. Leupold
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER DENYING COUNSEL - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?