Gargar v. Thompson

Filing 13

ORDER denying Petitioner's #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold.(MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 ABDULKADIR OSMAN GARGAR, 11 12 13 v. Petitioner, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00128-TMC-GJL ORDER DENYING COUNSEL MARK THOMPSON, Respondent. 14 15 The District Court has referred this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action to United States Magistrate 16 Judge Grady J. Leupold. Presently before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel. 17 Dkt. 10. 18 There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, 19 unless an evidentiary hearing is required or such appointment is “necessary for the effective 20 utilization of discovery procedures.” See McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991); United 21 States v. Duarte-Higareda, 68 F.3d 369, 370 (9th Cir. 1995); United States v. Angelone, 894 22 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 1990); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983); Rules 23 Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts 6(a) and 8(c). The Court also 24 ORDER DENYING COUNSEL - 1 1 may appoint counsel “at any stage of the case if the interest of justice so requires.” Weygandt, 2 718 F.2d at 954. In deciding whether to appoint counsel, however, the Court “must evaluate the 3 likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims 4 pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Id. 5 Petitioner has not demonstrated the circumstances required for the Court to appoint 6 counsel. As explained in the Court’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 12), Petitioner is not 7 likely to succeed on the merits and an evidentiary hearing is not warranted in this case. Id. 8 Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. 10) is DENIED. 9 Dated this 27th day of March, 2024. 10 A 11 Grady J. Leupold United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER DENYING COUNSEL - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?