Marshall v. Mason

Filing 19

ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommendation. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Dkt. No. 5 , is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. In accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jamal N Whitehead. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Steven Marshall, Prisoner ID: 395661) (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 MARSHALL, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00254-JNW-MLP Petitioner, ORDER v. MASON, Respondent. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 The Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Michelle L. Peterson is before the Court. Dkt. No. 18. Petitioner Steven Maurice Marshall filed no objections to the R&R, and the time for filing objections has passed. Having considered the R&R, the remainder of the record, and the relevant law, the Court is satisfied that the R&R contains no errors of law and that there are no clear errors on the face of the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: • 22 23 ORDER - 1 The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 18. • 1 The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Dkt. No. 5, is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2 • 3 In accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases 4 in the United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is 5 DENIED. • 6 The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order and the 7 accompanying Judgment to Petitioner and to the Hon. Michelle L. 8 Peterson. 9 10 Dated this 3rd day of January, 2025. 11 Jamal N. Whitehead United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?