Beagle et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al

Filing 58

ORDER re Parties' 57 Motion to Stay. Amazon's deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is stayed. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a third amended complaint by 12/9/2024, Amazon's deadline to respond to Pl aintiffs' amended complaint is extended to 1/17/2025, Plaintiffs' response to any motion to dismiss the amended complaint is extended to 2/14/2025, and Amazon's reply in support is extended to 2/28/2025. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (MJV)

Download PDF
The Honorable James L. Robart 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 MEREDITH BEAGLE, JORDAN GUERRERO, No. 2:24-cv-00316-JLR 10 and SOFAUNA JOHNSON on Behalf of ______________ Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STAY, FILING OF 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND Plaintiffs, 12 SCHEDULE FOR ANSWER OR v. MOTION TO DISMISS 13 14 AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: NOVEMBER 4, 2024 STIPULATED MOTION Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 10(g) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, the Parties 19 having conferred about additional information requested by Plaintiffs, stipulate and agree, 20 subject to the Court approval, as follows: 21 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint, (“SAC”), Dkt. 56, on 22 October 21, 2024, asserting claims against Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon.com Services LLC 23 (collectively “Amazon”) under the Video Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2710 and 24 California Civil Code § 1799.3. Id. ¶¶ 150–166. 25 WHEREAS, prior to filing the SAC, Plaintiff Sofauna Johnson alleges that she submitted 26 multiple data requests to Amazon pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.110 et seq. See SAC ¶¶ 97– 27 106. Johnson alleges that she submitted her first data request on July 10, 2024, through __________ ORDER FOR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SETTING DEADLINES- 1 (2:24-cv-00316-JLR) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 Amazon’s “Request Your Data” webpage. Id. ¶ 98. Amazon asserts that its records show that 2 Johnson’s July 10, 2024 request was incomplete because it sought only Johnson’s subscription 3 data, and that Amazon complied with that request by providing Johnson this data. 4 WHEREAS, Johnson alleges she then submitted a second data request on October 3, 5 2024, by emailing Amazon a request seeking data under Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.110 and 6 § 1798.115(c). Id. ¶ 103. In the SAC, Johnson alleges that Amazon has yet to fully respond to 7 Johnson’s second request and that Amazon’s failure to respond supports a reasonable inference 8 in Plaintiffs’ favor that Johnson’s data was disclosed in violation of the VPPA. Id. ¶ 106. 9 Amazon denies these allegations. 10 WHEREAS, Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.130(a)(2)(A) establishes a 45-day deadline for 11 businesses to respond to consumer requests under Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.110 et seq. 12 Accordingly, Amazon has until November 18, 2024, to respond to Johnson’s October 3, 2024 13 request. 14 WHEREAS, recognizing that Amazon’s time to respond Johnson’s October 3, 2024 data 15 request has not expired, and that a further response might affect Plaintiff’s allegations in the 16 SAC, counsel for Amazon met and conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel (i) to clarify the issues 17 surrounding Johnson’s second data request and Amazon’s forthcoming response, and (ii) the 18 possibliy of an amendment by Plaintiffs based on Amazon’s response. Having met and 19 conferred, counsel for Plaintiffs and Amazon have agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, 20 to stay Amazon’s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ SAC and to allow Plaintiffs leave to file a 21 third amended complaint after receiving and reviewing Amazon’s response to Johnson’s second 22 data request. Counsel for Plaintiffs and Amazon further agree that a stay is appropriate here 23 because: (1) no damage or prejudice to either party will result from a stay; and (2) staying 24 Amazon’s deadline to respond so that Plaintiffs can file an third amended complaint will help 25 simplify the issues and questions of law in this case. See CMAC, Inc. v. Hall, 300 F.2d 265, 268 26 (9th Cir. 1962) (in determining whether to grant a stay, courts consider “possible damage which 27 may result from the granting of stay, the hardship or inequity which a party may suffer in being ___________ ORDER FOR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SETTING DEADLINES- 2 (2:24-cv-00316-JLR) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 required to go forward, and the orderly course of justice measured in terms of the simplifying or 2 complicating of issues, proof, and questions of law which could be expected to result from a 3 stay.”). 4 NOW THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the Court, the Parties hereby agree as 5 follows: 6 1. Amazon’s time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint shall be 7 stayed and Amazon shall not be required to answer or move with respect to the presently filed 8 Second Amended Complaint at this time. 9 2. Plaintiffs will have until December 9, 2024, to file a Third Amended Complaint 10 based upon additional information received by Plaintiffs from Amazon, should they chose to do 11 so, or designate the previously filed Second Amended Complaint as the operative complaint. 12 3. Amazon shall file their dispositive motion to the operative pleading on or before 13 January 17, 2025. 14 4. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to any dispositive motion on or before 15 February 14, 2025. 16 5. Amazon’s reply to any opposition shall be due by February 28, 2025. 17 18 The Parties have previously sought and obtained one prior extension of time in this 19 matter. The only deadlines or case event dates that will be impacted by this stipulated extension 20 concern the deadlines for Amazon to respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint and any 21 associated briefing schedule for any motion to dismiss. 22 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 24 DATED this 4 November, 2024. 25 26 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR SETTING DEADLINES- 3 (2:24-cv-00316-JLR) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 BURNS CHAREST LLP 2 By _s/ Amanda K. Klevorn____ Amanda K. Klevorn, pro hac vice Korey A. Nelson, pro hac vice 3 Laura S. Seggerman, pro hac vice 4 365 Canal Street, Suite 1170 New Orleans, LA 70130 5 Telephone: (504) 799-2845 Facsimile: (504) 881-1765 6 Email: aklevorn@burnscharest.com Email: knelson@burnscharest.com 7 Email: lseggerman@burnscharest.com 8 Cristina Delise, pro hac vice 9 757 Third Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10017 10 Telephone: (469) 904-4550 Facsimile: (469) 444-5002 11 Email: cdelise@burnscharest.com 12 DUNCAN LAW, PLLC 13 14 15 16 17 Shaquelle M. Duncan, WSBA #56701 410 SW 10th Street, Suite 215 Renton, WA 98057 Telephone: (206) 237-7714 Facsimile: (206) 238-1324 Email: duncans@duncanlawpllc.com 18 BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE, P.C. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Melissa A. Fortunato, pro hac vice 580 California Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 568-2124 Facsimile: (212) 304-0506 Email: fortunato@bespc.com Lawrence P. Eagel, pro hac vice Casey C. DeReus, pro hac vice 810 Seventh Avenue, Suite 620 New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 308-5858 Facsimile: (212) 486-0462 Email: eagel@bespc.com Email: dereus@bespc.com DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP By s/ John Goldmark John Goldmark, WSBA #40980 Lauren B. Rainwater, WSBA #43625 Erwin Reschke, pro hac vice 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 Telephone: (206) 757-8136 Email: JohnGoldmark@dwt.com Email: LaurenRainwater@dwt.com Email: ErwinReschke@dwt.com Counsel for Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services LLC CARSON NOEL PLLC By _s/ Wright A. Noel__________ Wright A. Noel 20 Sixth Avenue NE Issaquah, WA 98027 Telephone: (425) 837-4717 Facsimile: (425) 837-5396 Email: wright@carsonnoel.com BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Joseph I. Marchese, pro hac vice Phillip L. Fraietta, pro hac vice 1300 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (646) 837-7150 Facsimile: (212) 989-9163 Email: jmarchese@bursor.com Email: pfraietta@bursor.com Brittany S. Scott, pro hac vice 1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 Email: bscott@bursor.com Counsel for Plaintiff Sofauna Johnson 27 ________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SETTING DEADLINES- 4 (2:24-cv-00316-JLR) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 Counsel for Plaintiffs Meredith Beagle 2 and Jordan Guerrero 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 _________ ORDER FOR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SETTING DEADLINES- 5 (2:24-cv-00316-JLR) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax ___________ ORDER [PROPOSED] 1 2 3 Pursuant to the Parties’ above stipulated motion, the Court Orders that: ? stayed; 4 5 ? ? Amazon’s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is extended to January 17, 2025; 8 9 Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a third amended complaint by December 9, 2024, 6 7 Amazon’s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is ? Plaintiffs’ response to any motion to dismiss the amended complaint is extended 10 to February 14, 2025, and Amazon’s reply in support is extended to February 28, 11 2025. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2024. 13 A 14 The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 __________ ORDER FOR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SETTING DEADLINES- 6 (2:24-cv-00316-JLR) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?