Northfield Insurance Company v. Yates Wood & MacDonald Inc et al

Filing 55

ORDER granting Parties' 54 Stipulated MOTION Regarding Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim. Defendant Yates shall file its Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim with the Court within three (3) days of this Order. Plaintiff Northfiel d Insurance Company shall answer Yates' Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims pursuant to the timelines set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Northfield does not need to answer Defendant Yates' 53 First Amended Answer and Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (MJV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurer, Plaintiff, v. NO. 2:24-cv-00441-TL [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM YATES, WOOD, & MACDONALD, INC., a Washington corporation; 1000 MADISON, LLC, a Washington limited liability company; GARY R. ALLEN, an individual; HOLLY PUGSLEY, an individual, Defendants. THIS MATTER came before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation Regarding Defendant Yates, Wood, & Macdonald, Inc.’s (“Yates”) Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim. The Court, being familiar with the records and files herein, having considered the Stipulation and being otherwise fully advised, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation Regarding Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim as follows: 1. Defendant Yates shall file its Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim with the Court within three (3) days of this Order; [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM - 1 NO. 2:24-cv-00441-TL GORDON TILDEN THOMAS CORDELL 600 University Street Suite 2915 Seattle, WA 98101 206.467.6477 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 2. Plaintiff Northfield Insurance Company (“Northfield”) shall answer Yates’ Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims pursuant to the timelines set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 3. Plaintiff Northfield does not need to answer Defendant Yates’ First Amended Answer and Counterclaims (Dkt. 53). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 22nd day of November, 2024. A Tana Lin United States District Judge Presented by: GORDON TILDEN THOMAS & CORDELL LLP Defendant Yates, Wood & MacDonald, Inc. By: s/ Brendan Winslow-Nason Brendan Winslow-Nason, WSBA #39328 Katherine S. Wan, WSBA #58647 Stephanie Hon, WSBA 62123 600 University Street, Suite 2915 Seattle, Washington 98101 206.467.6477 bwinslow-nason@gordontilden.com kwan@gordontilden.com shon@gordontilden.com [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM - 2 NO. 2:24-cv-00441-TL GORDON TILDEN THOMAS CORDELL 600 University Street Suite 2915 Seattle, WA 98101 206.467.6477

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?