Northfield Insurance Company v. Yates Wood & MacDonald Inc et al
Filing
55
ORDER granting Parties' 54 Stipulated MOTION Regarding Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim. Defendant Yates shall file its Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim with the Court within three (3) days of this Order. Plaintiff Northfiel d Insurance Company shall answer Yates' Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims pursuant to the timelines set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Northfield does not need to answer Defendant Yates' 53 First Amended Answer and Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (MJV)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, a
foreign insurer,
Plaintiff,
v.
NO. 2:24-cv-00441-TL
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
REGARDING SECOND AMENDED
ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
YATES, WOOD, & MACDONALD, INC., a
Washington corporation; 1000 MADISON,
LLC, a Washington limited liability company;
GARY R. ALLEN, an individual; HOLLY
PUGSLEY, an individual,
Defendants.
THIS MATTER came before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation Regarding Defendant
Yates, Wood, & Macdonald, Inc.’s (“Yates”) Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim. The
Court, being familiar with the records and files herein, having considered the Stipulation and
being otherwise fully advised, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation Regarding Second Amended
Answer and Counterclaim as follows:
1.
Defendant Yates shall file its Second Amended Answer and Counterclaim with
the Court within three (3) days of this Order;
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
REGARDING SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND
COUNTERCLAIM - 1
NO. 2:24-cv-00441-TL
GORDON
TILDEN
THOMAS
CORDELL
600 University Street
Suite 2915
Seattle, WA 98101
206.467.6477
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
2.
Plaintiff Northfield Insurance Company (“Northfield”) shall answer Yates’
Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims pursuant to the timelines set forth in the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure;
3.
Plaintiff Northfield does not need to answer Defendant Yates’ First Amended
Answer and Counterclaims (Dkt. 53).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 22nd day of November, 2024.
A
Tana Lin
United States District Judge
Presented by:
GORDON TILDEN THOMAS & CORDELL LLP
Defendant Yates, Wood & MacDonald, Inc.
By: s/ Brendan Winslow-Nason
Brendan Winslow-Nason, WSBA #39328
Katherine S. Wan, WSBA #58647
Stephanie Hon, WSBA 62123
600 University Street, Suite 2915
Seattle, Washington 98101
206.467.6477
bwinslow-nason@gordontilden.com
kwan@gordontilden.com
shon@gordontilden.com
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
REGARDING SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND
COUNTERCLAIM - 2
NO. 2:24-cv-00441-TL
GORDON
TILDEN
THOMAS
CORDELL
600 University Street
Suite 2915
Seattle, WA 98101
206.467.6477
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?