Islas v. Bank of America

Filing 32

ORDER. With respect to the motion at Dkt. # 28 , to the extent it is a motion for leave to amend the complaint, the Court DENIES it as it does not attach a copy of the proposed amended pleading as an exhibit. To the extent it is a discovery motion, the Court DENIES it for failure to comply with the discovery rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. With respect to the motion at Dkt. # 29 , to the extent it is a motion for leave to amend the complaint, the Court DENIES it without prejudice. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (MJV) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 11 12 13 14 IVAN GABRIEL ISLAS, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-CV-00493-JHC ORDER v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. 15 16 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff’s motions at Dkt. ## 28 and 17 29. Defendant did not file an opposition to either motion. The Court has reviewed the motions, 18 the rest of the file, and the governing law. Being fully advised, the Court rules as follows: 19 With respect to both motion documents, to the extent that they are submissions in 20 opposition to Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss at Dkt. # 26, the Court will consider them 21 as such. See LCR 7. 22 With respect to the motion at Dkt. # 28, to the extent it is a motion for leave to amend the 23 complaint, the Court DENIES it as it does not attach a copy of the proposed amended pleading as 24 an exhibit. See LCR 15(a). To the extent it is a discovery motion, the Court DENIES it for 25 failure to comply with the discovery rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 26 to 37. ORDER - 1 1 With respect to the motion at Dkt. # 29, to the extent it is a motion for leave to amend the 2 complaint, the Court DENIES it without prejudice. The portion of the motion that appears to be 3 the proposed amended complaint, Dkt. # 29 at 3-7, is handwritten and the Court does not find it 4 to be completely legible. The Court notes that Plaintiff is able to type submissions to the Court. 5 See, e.g., Dkt. # 28. 6 DATED this 27th day of January, 2025. 7 8 JOHN H. CHUN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?