Barrows v. Schofer et al

Filing 10

ORDER granting Parties' 9 Stipulated MOTION to Hold Case in Abeyance. The case is held in abeyance until 11/22/2024. The parties shall submit a joint status report on or before 11/22/2024. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Download PDF
District Judge Ricardo S. Martinez 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 JENNIFER LYNN BARROWS, Case No. 2:24-cv-00598-RSM 10 Plaintiff, 11 STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE AND ORDER v. 12 Noted for Consideration: September 23, 2024 ANDREW SCHOFER, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal 16 Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 16, hereby jointly stipulate and 17 move to stay these proceedings through November 22, 2024. Plaintiff brings this litigation 18 pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and Mandamus Act seeking, inter alia, to compel 19 Defendants to complete processing of Plaintiff’s husband’s immigrant visa application. This 20 case is currently stayed at the request of the parties. Dkt. No. 8. For good cause, the parties 21 request that the Court hold this case in abeyance through November 22, 2024. 22 Courts have “broad discretion” to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 23 (1997). “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to 24 control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for STIPULATED MOTION [Case No. 2:24-cv-00598-RSM] - 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 1201 PACIFIC AVE., STE. 700 TACOMA, WA 98402 (253) 428-3800 1 counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed. R. 2 Civ. P. 1. As described previously, the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan, returned Plaintiff’s 3 4 Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative, to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 5 (“USCIS”) with a recommendation that the petition be revoked. Today, USCIS completed its 6 review and reaffirmed its approval of the Form I-130. The reaffirmation has been sent to the 7 Department of State’s National Visa Center. Due to the recency of this action, the parties need 8 time to confer and to determine next steps for this litigation. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the instant action be stayed until 9 10 November 22, 2024. The parties will submit a joint status report on or before November 22, 11 2024. 12 DATED this 23rd day of September, 2024. 13 Respectfully submitted, 14 TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney 15 s/ Michelle R. Lambert MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 16 Assistant United States Attorney 17 United States Attorney’s Office Western District of Washington 18 1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 Tacoma, Washington 98402 19 Phone: (253) 428-3824 Fax: (253) 428-3826 20 Email: michelle.lambert@usdoj.gov GOLDSTEIN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS s/ Joshua L. Goldstein JOSHUA L. GOLDSTEIN, WSBA #61773 611 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste. 317 Los Angeles, California 90017 Phone: (213) 425-1979 Email: jg@jgoldlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 21 Attorneys for Defendants 22 I certify that this memorandum contains 275 words, in compliance with the Local Civil 23 Rules. 24 STIPULATED MOTION [Case No. 2:24-cv-00598-RSM] - 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 1201 PACIFIC AVE., STE. 700 TACOMA, WA 98402 (253) 428-3800 ORDER 1 2 The case is held in abeyance until November 22, 2024. The parties shall submit a joint 3 status report on or before November 22, 2024. It is so ORDERED. 4 5 DATED this 24th day of September, 2024. 6 A 7 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 STIPULATED MOTION [Case No. 2:24-cv-00598-RSM] - 3 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 1201 PACIFIC AVE., STE. 700 TACOMA, WA 98402 (253) 428-3800

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?