Baus v. Fluent, Inc. et al

Filing 13

ORDER granting Parties' 12 Joint Stipulated MOTION to Extend Time to Answer. Defendants' time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Initial Complaint is extended to 8/12/2024. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 11 12 STEVE BAUS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. FLUENT, INC., and FLUENT, LLC d/b/a SAVETODAY Case No. 2:24-cv-00801-JHC ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS FLUENT, INC. AND FLUENT, LLC’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 On July 8, 2024, the Parties filed the Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint asking the Court to extend the time to respond to Plaintiff’s Initial Complaint to August 12, 2024. Dkt. # 12. The Court, having considered the Parties’ Stipulation, and for good cause shown, hereby 23 24 GRANTS the stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 25 26 27 Defendants’ time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Initial Complaint is extended to August 12, 2024. / 28 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND- 1 Case No.: 2:24-cv-00801-JHC 1 DATED this 8th day of July, 2024. 2 3 JOHN H. CHUN United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND- 2 Case No.: 2:24-cv-00801-JHC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?