Monlux v. 3M Company et al

Filing 161

ORDER granting Defendant's 158 Motion to Substitute Attorney. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to terminate Ryan Espegard and Michael Ricketts as counsel for Kiewit Corporation and to add Jeanne F. Loftis and Hayley D. Hollis. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ELAINE M. MONLUX, v. Plaintiff, 3M COMPANY et al., CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00912-LK ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on counsel for Defendant Kiewit Corporation’s Motion 17 for Leave to Withdraw Appearance and Substitution of Counsel. Dkt. No. 158. Counsel seeks an 18 order permitting Ryan Espegard and Michael Ricketts to withdraw as counsel of record for Kiewit 19 Corporation while Jeanne Loftis and Hayley Hollis of Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C., who recently 20 filed a Notice of Appearance, Dkt. No. 149, continue as its counsel, Dkt. No. 158 at 1. Counsel 21 have certified that they served the motion on their client and Plaintiff’s attorneys. Id. at 2. 22 Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 83.2(b)(1) and (b)(2), the Court GRANTS the motion, Dkt. 23 No. 158, and DIRECTS the Clerk to terminate Ryan Espegard and Michael Ricketts of Gordon 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL - 1 1 Thomas Honeywell LLP as counsel for Kiewit Corporation and to list Kiewit Corporation’s 2 counsel’s information in the docket as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Jeanne F. Loftis, WSBA # 35355 Hayley D. Hollis, WSBA # 56032 Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C. One SW Columbia Blvd, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97214 asbestos@bullivant.com Dated this 30th day of August, 2024. A Lauren King United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?