Atikurraheman v. Garland et al
Filing
6
ORDER granting Petitioner's 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court appoints the Federal Public Defender to represent petitioner in these proceedings. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo.(MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
4
5
6
PATHAN ATIKURRAHEMAN,
7
8
9
v.
MERRICK GARLAND, et al.,
ORDER APPOINTING THE
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Respondent.
10
11
Petitioner,
Case No. 2:24-cv-01256-DGE-TLF
This is a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 immigration habeas action. Petitioner has filed a
12
motion to appoint counsel. Dkt. 2. Having considered the motion, petitioner’s financial
13
eligibility, and the balance of the record, the Court finds and ORDERS:
14
1) The Court is in receipt of a letter from the Federal Public Defender’s Office
15
indicating that this case falls within the class of cases potentially governed by
16
Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). Because of the complex issues
17
involved in this case, the interests of justice require that counsel be appointed for
18
petitioner. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). As required by statute, petitioner has
19
demonstrated financial eligibility for such appointment. See id. Accordingly,
20
petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel (Dkt. 2) is GRANTED. The Court
21
appoints the Federal Public Defender to represent petitioner in these
22
proceedings.
23
24
25
ORDER APPOINTING THE FEDERAL PUBLIC
DEFENDER - 1
1
2) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to petitioner, to the Federal Public
2
Defender, to counsel for respondents, and to the Honorable David G. Estudillo.
3
Dated this 28th day of August, 2024.
4
5
A
6
7
Theresa L. Fricke
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ORDER APPOINTING THE FEDERAL PUBLIC
DEFENDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?