Atikurraheman v. Garland et al

Filing 6

ORDER granting Petitioner's 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court appoints the Federal Public Defender to represent petitioner in these proceedings. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo.(MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 PATHAN ATIKURRAHEMAN, 7 8 9 v. MERRICK GARLAND, et al., ORDER APPOINTING THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Respondent. 10 11 Petitioner, Case No. 2:24-cv-01256-DGE-TLF This is a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 immigration habeas action. Petitioner has filed a 12 motion to appoint counsel. Dkt. 2. Having considered the motion, petitioner’s financial 13 eligibility, and the balance of the record, the Court finds and ORDERS: 14 1) The Court is in receipt of a letter from the Federal Public Defender’s Office 15 indicating that this case falls within the class of cases potentially governed by 16 Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). Because of the complex issues 17 involved in this case, the interests of justice require that counsel be appointed for 18 petitioner. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). As required by statute, petitioner has 19 demonstrated financial eligibility for such appointment. See id. Accordingly, 20 petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel (Dkt. 2) is GRANTED. The Court 21 appoints the Federal Public Defender to represent petitioner in these 22 proceedings. 23 24 25 ORDER APPOINTING THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER - 1 1 2) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to petitioner, to the Federal Public 2 Defender, to counsel for respondents, and to the Honorable David G. Estudillo. 3 Dated this 28th day of August, 2024. 4 5 A 6 7 Theresa L. Fricke United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER APPOINTING THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?