Gach v. Lyons et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 7 In Forma Pauperis Application. Plaintiff's IFP application, Dkt. 7 , is GRANTED. However, the undersigned recommends review by the assigned District Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B). Signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (KRA) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

KOANG GACH,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11

v.
GRANT C. LYONS, et al.,

Case No. C24-1285-JCC
ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS APPLICATION

Defendants.

12
13
14

Because Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $405 filing fee,

15

Plaintiff financially qualifies for in forma pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

16

1915(a)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff’s IFP application, Dkt. 7, is GRANTED. However, the

17

undersigned recommends review by the assigned District Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 1915

18

(e)(2)(B). The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to the

19

assigned District Judge.

20

Dated this 30th day of August, 2024.

21

A

22

S. KATE VAUGHAN
United States Magistrate Judge

23

ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION - 1