Sant et al v. RocketReach LLC

Filing 24

ORDER granting Parties' 21 Stipulated Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule Relating to Defendant's 18 Motion to Dismiss, 19 Motion to Strike, and 16 Motion to Compel Arbitration. The deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to the Motions is extended to 3/13/2025 and the deadline for Defendant to reply to Plaintiffs' anticipated responses is extended to 4/14/2025. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (KRA)

Download PDF
1 THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 JOSEPH SANT, MERTON CHUN, RONESHA SMITH, and HEATHER NICASTRO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiffs, vs. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE AND REPLY DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION ROCKETREACH LLC, Defendant. 15 16 Case No. 2:24-cv-1626-RSM STIPULATION WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Joseph Sant, Merton Chun, Ronesha Smith, and Heather Nicastro (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed Case No. 2:24-cv-1626 against RocketReach LLC (“Defendant”) on October 8, 2024; WHEREAS, Defendant was served with Plaintiffs’ Complaint on October 23, 2024; WHEREAS, Defendant on December 27, 2024 filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 18), a Motion to Strike Class Allegations (ECF No. 19), and a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 16) (taken together, the “Motions”); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ current deadline to respond to the Motions is February 11, 2025; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has numerous interceding briefing deadlines and arguments in other matters before February 11, 2025; WHEREAS, Defendant’s current deadline to reply to Plaintiffs’ anticipated responses is February 18, 2025; STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE AND REPLY DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION - 1 Case No. 2:24-cv-1626-RSM HEDIN LLP 1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 610 Miami, Florida 33131 +1 (305) 357-2107 1 2 WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel has numerous interceding briefing deadlines in other matters before February 18, 2025; 3 THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE to extend the 4 deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to the Motions to March 13, 2025 and the deadline for Defendant 5 to reply to Plaintiffs’ anticipated responses to April 14, 2025. This stipulation shall not operate 6 as an admission of any factual allegation or legal conclusion, nor shall it operate as a waiver or 7 otherwise affect any right, defense, claim or objection by any party. 8 Stipulated to this 21st day of January, 2025. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Presented and stipulated to by: NICK MAJOR LAW By: /s/_Nick Major Nick Major, WSBA #49579 450 Alaskan Way S., #200 Seattle, WA 98104 Email: nick@nickmajorlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs HEDIN LLP By: /s/_Tyler K. Somes Tyler K. Somes, Pro Hac Vice 1100 15th St NW, Ste. 04-108 Washington, D.C. 20005 Email: tsomes@hedinllp.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Stipulated to by: 23 WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 24 By: /s/ Patrick G. Lynch Patrick G. Lynch, WSBA #53147 520 Pike St., Ste. 2350 Seattle, Washington 98101 Patrick.Lynch@wilsonelser.com Attorney for RocketReach LLC. 25 26 27 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE AND REPLY DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION - 2 Case No. 2:24-cv-1626-RSM HEDIN LLP 1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 610 Miami, Florida 33131 +1 (305) 357-2107 1 2 ORDER 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED this 27th day of January, 2025. 5 A 6 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE AND REPLY DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION - 3 Case No. 2:24-cv-1626-RSM HEDIN LLP 1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 610 Miami, Florida 33131 +1 (305) 357-2107

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?