Sant et al v. RocketReach LLC
Filing
24
ORDER granting Parties' 21 Stipulated Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule Relating to Defendant's 18 Motion to Dismiss, 19 Motion to Strike, and 16 Motion to Compel Arbitration. The deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to the Motions is extended to 3/13/2025 and the deadline for Defendant to reply to Plaintiffs' anticipated responses is extended to 4/14/2025. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (KRA)
1
THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
JOSEPH SANT, MERTON CHUN,
RONESHA SMITH, and HEATHER
NICASTRO, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated
Plaintiffs,
vs.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND
RESPONSE AND REPLY DEADLINES
PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO
STRIKE, AND MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION
ROCKETREACH LLC,
Defendant.
15
16
Case No. 2:24-cv-1626-RSM
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Joseph Sant, Merton Chun, Ronesha Smith, and Heather Nicastro
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed Case No. 2:24-cv-1626 against RocketReach LLC (“Defendant”)
on October 8, 2024;
WHEREAS, Defendant was served with Plaintiffs’ Complaint on October 23, 2024;
WHEREAS, Defendant on December 27, 2024 filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 18), a
Motion to Strike Class Allegations (ECF No. 19), and a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay
Proceedings (ECF No. 16) (taken together, the “Motions”);
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ current deadline to respond to the Motions is February 11, 2025;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has numerous interceding briefing deadlines and
arguments in other matters before February 11, 2025;
WHEREAS, Defendant’s current deadline to reply to Plaintiffs’ anticipated responses is
February 18, 2025;
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE AND REPLY
DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION - 1
Case No. 2:24-cv-1626-RSM
HEDIN LLP
1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 610
Miami, Florida 33131
+1 (305) 357-2107
1
2
WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel has numerous interceding briefing deadlines in other
matters before February 18, 2025;
3
THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE to extend the
4
deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to the Motions to March 13, 2025 and the deadline for Defendant
5
to reply to Plaintiffs’ anticipated responses to April 14, 2025. This stipulation shall not operate
6
as an admission of any factual allegation or legal conclusion, nor shall it operate as a waiver or
7
otherwise affect any right, defense, claim or objection by any party.
8
Stipulated to this 21st day of January, 2025.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Presented and stipulated to by:
NICK MAJOR LAW
By: /s/_Nick Major
Nick Major, WSBA #49579
450 Alaskan Way S., #200
Seattle, WA 98104
Email: nick@nickmajorlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HEDIN LLP
By: /s/_Tyler K. Somes
Tyler K. Somes, Pro Hac Vice
1100 15th St NW, Ste. 04-108
Washington, D.C. 20005
Email: tsomes@hedinllp.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Stipulated to by:
23
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
24
By: /s/ Patrick G. Lynch
Patrick G. Lynch, WSBA #53147
520 Pike St., Ste. 2350
Seattle, Washington 98101
Patrick.Lynch@wilsonelser.com
Attorney for RocketReach LLC.
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE AND REPLY
DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION - 2
Case No. 2:24-cv-1626-RSM
HEDIN LLP
1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 610
Miami, Florida 33131
+1 (305) 357-2107
1
2
ORDER
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED this 27th day of January, 2025.
5
A
6
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE AND REPLY
DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION - 3
Case No. 2:24-cv-1626-RSM
HEDIN LLP
1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 610
Miami, Florida 33131
+1 (305) 357-2107
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?